Constraints and adaptations in crocodyliform skull evolution

TL;DR

This study explores how crocodile relatives evolved different skull shapes, finding that dome-shaped skulls are better at handling feeding forces when not constrained by water.

Contribution

The study provides new biomechanical evidence linking skull shape to feeding efficiency and hydrodynamic constraints in crocodyliform evolution.

Findings

Oreinirostral skulls show increased resistance to feeding-induced stresses compared to platyrostral ones.

Muscle efficiency is higher in dome-shaped skulls, supporting their functional advantage in terrestrial species.

Hydrodynamic constraints likely influenced the evolution of broad, flat snouts in modern crocodilians.

Abstract

Crocodyliforms display a diverse range of skull morphologies through their evolutionary history. Extant crocodilians possess platyrostral (broad and flat) snouts, thought to be sub-optimal for resisting feeding loads due to the conflicting demands of feeding and hydrodynamic constraints. In contrast, numerous Mesozoic crocodyliforms possessed oreinirostral (dome-shaped) skulls, were terrestrial and hence free from hydrodynamic constraint. This study aims to examine the role of function in determining skull shape in crocodyliforms and assesses the difference in stress resistance between oreinirostral and platyrostral taxa. We hypothesize that in the absence of hydrodynamic constraints, oreinirostral taxa have skulls that are better suited for resisting feeding-induced loads. Using finite element analysis, we evaluated biomechanical performance in oreinirostral notosuchian taxa Baurusuchus salgadoensis, Montealtosuchus arrudacamposi and Caipirasuchus paulistanus, compared to the extant platyrostral Alligator mississippiensis, Crocodylus niloticus and Paleosuchus palpebrosus. Results show that oreinirostral morphologies are comparatively better suited for resisting forces generated during feeding, with increased muscular efficiency, supporting the hypothesis that hydrodynamic constraints influence crocodyliform skull evolution.

Figures