Barriers to contraceptive implant removal among current and prior implant users in Kisumu, Kenya: Results from a cross-sectional population-based survey
Brooke W. Bullington, Stephanie Chung, Emilia Goland, Dickens Otieno Onyango, Leigh Senderowicz, Abigael Mwanyiro, Claire W. Rothschild, Ben Wekesa, Brian Frizzelle, Ginger Golub, Katherine Tumlinson

TL;DR
This study finds that cost is a major barrier for women in Kenya seeking to remove contraceptive implants, suggesting that removing fees could improve access.
Contribution
The study quantifies the frequency of barriers to contraceptive implant removal in Kenya, emphasizing cost as a key issue.
Findings
Around 40% of current implant users anticipated barriers to removal.
Cost was the most common barrier reported for both current and prior implant users.
Sociodemographic factors were not linked to facing removal challenges.
Abstract
There has been increased promotion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the Global South in recent years. Studies have documented that women face barriers to removal when they desire to discontinue their LARC method, though few have quantified how often such experiences occur. We estimated the proportion of current and prior implant users who experienced or anticipated challenges with method removal using secondary data from a population-based survey administered to reproductive-aged women (18–49 years) in Kisumu, Kenya. We included women who reported current contraceptive implant use (n = 518) or ever using an implant that was later removed (n = 838). We asked current implant users about their anticipated barriers to removal and experiences seeking removal. We asked those who reported prior implant removal about barriers they faced when seeking removal. Around 40% of…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Contraception · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Sexual function and dysfunction studies
