Complete genome sequences of six Lactobacillus iners strains isolated from Kenyan women
Daniella Serrador, Landon J. Getz, Kevin Y. Cao, Jhenielle R. Campbell, Rupert Kaul, William W. Navarre

TL;DR
This paper reports the full genome sequences of six Lactobacillus iners strains from Kenyan women, contributing to understanding their role in vaginal health.
Contribution
The study provides the first complete genome sequences of L. iners strains isolated from Kenyan women.
Findings
Six complete L. iners genomes were sequenced from cervicovaginal secretions in Nairobi.
The genomes may help clarify the role of L. iners in vaginal health and disease.
Abstract
Lactobacillus iners is one of the most common members of the vaginal microbiome, with a controversial role in vaginal health. Here, we present the complete genome sequences of six L. iners strains isolated from cervicovaginal secretions from women in Nairobi, Kenya.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain | GenBank accession | Raw reads | Length (bp) | No. of reads | Avg read quality | Read length N50 | Assembly coverage | GC content (%) | CDS | tRNA | rRNA | ANI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVM020S14 |
|
| 1,354,189 | 52,819 | 13.8 | 4,861 | 53× | 33.5 | 1,235 | 70 | 18 | 98.8 |
| NVM025S01 |
|
| 1,359,327 | 86,416 | 15.2 | 3,901 | 79× | 33.5 | 1,271 | 70 | 18 | 98.4 |
| NVM041S27 |
|
| 1,319,338 | 351,366 | 21.8 | 1,298 | 203× | 33.5 | 1,196 | 70 | 18 | 98.8 |
| NVM076S08 |
|
| 1,305,175 | 419,916 | 20.8 | 1,132 | 260× | 33.0 | 1,182 | 69 | 15 | 98.6 |
| NVM196S05 |
|
| 1,340,659 | 12,535 | 12.9 | 6,476 | 70× | 33.0 | 1,217 | 69 | 15 | 98.9 |
| NVM210S01 |
|
| 1,353,401 | 607,684 | 20.8 | 932 | 285× | 33.0 | 1,236 | 69 | 15 | 98.9 |
- —New Frontiers in Research Fund
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive tract infections research · Gut microbiota and health · Probiotics and Fermented Foods
ANNOUNCEMENT
Most vaginal microbiomes are predominantly colonized by a single Lactobacillus species, such as Lactobacillus iners, which is estimated to be the most common vaginal bacterium globally (1, 2). Whether L. iners colonization protects against bacterial vaginosis is contested (1, 3, 4). Characterization of L. iners biology and the diversity of strains is needed to elucidate the role of L. iners in vaginal health. Here, we present the sequences of six L. iners strains isolated from Kenyan women.
Female sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, were enrolled through the Sex Worker’s Outreach Program clinics. All strains presented here were isolated from L. iners-dominated vaginal microbiomes (determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing), and each strain is from a different participant. Bacteria were isolated as previously described (5); in brief, frozen pellets of cervicovaginal secretions, collected using SoftCup (Evofem, San Diego, CA, USA), were plated on New York City III agar (6) and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h. All bacterial isolation and culture were performed in an anaerobic chamber (AS-580, Anaerobe Systems, Morgan Hill, CA, USA) using a gas mixture of 10% CO_2_, 10% H_2_, balance N_2_ (Linde, Mississauga, ON, Canada). L. iners isolates were identified using colony PCR for the inerolysin gene (5′-TACTAAGCCTGCACAAGCTG-3′; 5′-TGCATCAAATACATCACCTGG-3′).
For sequencing, 4 mL of Serrador’s Lactobacillus-adapted Iscove’s medium (5) was inoculated with an L. iners colony and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 42 h. gDNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA, A1120), with the following modifications: 1.5 mL of culture was used, and for strains with low DNA yields, two preparations were combined during re-hydration. gDNA libraries were prepared using the Rapid Sequencing DNA V14 Barcoding kit (SQK-RBK114.24, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) using manufacturer’s instructions. Size selection was not performed. gDNA libraries were subjected to long-read DNA sequencing on a MinION Mk1B using Kit 14 chemistry (R10.4.1, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). All tools were run with default settings unless otherwise stated. Base-calling was performed using Dorado in duplex mode (v0.8.3, using the SUP model). Reads were demultiplexed and adapter trimmed using Dorado (v0.8.3, demux mode). Read quality and length were computed using NanoComp (v1.25.3) (7) (Table 1). Error correction was not performed, and no reads were removed during quality control.
Genome assembly was performed with Flye (v2.9.5) (8, 9). Assembly coverage ranged from 53× to 285× across all six genomes, each a single circular contig (Table 1). Repeat graphs were manually visualized using Bandage (v0.9.0), confirming edge-to-edge coverage in genomes except NVM196S05 (12). NVM196S05 overlap trimming was done manually by mapping reads back to the assembly with minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) (13). Genomes were reoriented to begin at dnaA. The genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (v6.10) (10). Completeness and percent contamination were determined using CheckM (v1.2.3) (14). The average genome length was 1,338,681.5 bp with an average GC content of 33.25%. Each genome has an average nucleotide identity greater than 95% with Lactobacillus iners strain C0322A1, determined using FastANI (v1.33), confirming taxonomic assignment (11) (Table 1).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Holm JB, Carter KA, Ravel J, Brotman RM. 2023. Lactobacillus iners and genital health: molecular clues to an enigmatic vaginal species. Curr Infect Dis Rep 25:67–75. doi:10.1007/s 11908-023-00798-537234911 PMC 10209668 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2France MT, Ma B, Gajer P, Brown S, Humphrys MS, Holm JB, Waetjen LE, Brotman RM, Ravel J. 2020. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome 8:166. doi:10.1186/s 40168-020-00934-633228810 PMC 7684964 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. 2017. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 25:182–191. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.00727914761 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Vaneechoutte M. 2017. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res Microbiol 168:826–836. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2017.09.00328951208 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Serrador D, Campbell JR, Getz LJ, Cheung D, Shefraw G, Kaul R, Navarre WW. 2025. Practical media formulations for rapid growth of Lactobacillus iners and other vaginal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 91:e 0018325. doi:10.1128/aem.00183-2540626727 PMC 12366303 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Faur YC, Weisburd MH, Wilson ME, May PS. 1973. A new medium for the isolation of pathogenic Neisseria (NYC medium). I. Formulation and comparisons with standard media. Health Lab Sci 10:44–54.4633802 · pubmed ↗
- 7De Coster W, Rademakers R. 2023. Nano Pack 2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 39:btad 311. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad 31137171891 PMC 10196664 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi:10.1038/s 41587-019-0072-830936562 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
