Draft genome sequences of seven endophytic bacterial strains isolated from the roots of coastal plants in Taiwan
Hsi-Ching Yen, Fan-Chen Huang, Pei-Ru Chien, Chih-Lin Wu, Liang-Yu Chen, Chuan-Wen Ho, Guo-Zhang M. Song, Wei-Jen Lin, Hsing-Juh Lin, Chieh-Chen Huang, Hau-Hsuan Hwang, Chih-Horng Kuo

TL;DR
This paper presents draft genomes of seven bacteria from coastal plants in Taiwan, which could help in sustainable agriculture.
Contribution
The study provides new draft genome sequences of endophytic bacteria from coastal plants in Taiwan.
Findings
Seven endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from coastal plants in Taiwan.
Draft genome assemblies of these strains were generated to support their agricultural applications.
Abstract
Endophytic bacteria may promote host plant growth and have potential applications in sustainable agriculture. To support the development of these bioresources, we report the draft genome assemblies of seven endophytic bacterial strains isolated from coastal plants in Taiwan.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain | Species | Collection date | Location | GPS coordinates | Host | SRA accession | Assembly accession | No. of reads | Coverage (fold) | No. of contigs | Contig N50 (bp) | Assembly size (bp) | GC content (%) | No. of annotated genes | Complete- | Contamination (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCHU4564 | 09 | Taiwan: Changhua county, Fangyuan township | 23.928038 N 120.314438 E |
|
|
| 5,551,648 | 176.8 | 60 | 171,923 | 4,527,049 | 63.9 | 4,219 | 99.08 | 0.21 | |
| NCHU4578 |
| 09 | Taiwan: Changhua county, Fangyuan township | 23.928038 N 120.314438 E |
|
|
| 6,114,650 | 185.5 | 30 | 332,022 | 4,821,288 | 53.4 | 4,552 | 94.57 | 1.73 |
| NCHU4618 |
| 09 | Taiwan: Changhua county, Fangyuan township | 23.928038 N 120.314438 E |
|
|
| 5,831,752 | 176.4 | 33 | 332,022 | 4,821,709 | 53.4 | 4,553 | 94.57 | 1.92 |
| NCHU4620 |
| 09 | Taiwan: Changhua county, Fangyuan township | 23.928038 N 120.314438 E |
|
| 7,331,544 | 217.4 | 27 | 338,634 | 4,863,522 | 66.1 | 4,538 | 98.24 | 0.51 | |
| NCHU5208 | 04 June 2022 | Taiwan: Tainan city, Beimen district | 23.294624 N 120.111811 E |
|
|
| 7,388,284 | 186.8 | 100 | 116,682 | 5,664,563 | 63.1 | 5,202 | 99.95 | 1.41 | |
| NCHU5216 | 04 June 2022 | Taiwan: Tainan city, Beimen district | 23.294624 N 120.111811 E |
|
|
| 6,677,448 | 169.5 | 91 | 112,816 | 5,666,648 | 63.1 | 5,201 | 99.95 | 1.41 | |
| NCHU5232 | 04 June 2022 | Taiwan: Tainan city, Beimen district | 23.294624 N 120.111811 E |
|
|
| 6,494,230 | 167.2 | 94 | 115,768 | 5,666,451 | 63.1 | 5,198 | 99.95 | 1.41 |
- —Academia Sinicahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001869
- —National Science and Technology Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020950
- —Ministry of Educationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009122
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
ANNOUNCEMENT
Endophytic bacteria confer diverse benefits to host plants by promoting growth, nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and pathogen resistance through multiple mechanisms (1). In particular, strains isolated from halophytic plants can enhance host tolerance to salinity and drought, offering potential for improving crop resilience under abiotic stress in sustainable agriculture (2–4). To facilitate bioresource development, we report the draft genome assemblies of seven endophytic bacteria isolated from coastal plants in Taiwan, including halophytes and mangroves adapted to saline and drought stresses (Table 1).
Unless stated otherwise, methods followed the cited references. Kits were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, and bioinformatics tools were used with default settings. The strains were isolated as described previously (5). Briefly, roots were dug out with a clean shovel, soil particles were removed by shaking and rinsing in sterile water, and ∼1 g fresh tissue per plant was surface-sterilized by immersion in 1.2% NaOCl for 20–30 min followed by three rinses in sterile distilled water. The tissues were homogenized in distilled water, serially diluted, spread onto Luria Broth (LB) agar plates, and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Single colonies were re-streaked on fresh agar plates at least three times to ensure strain purity. For DNA extraction, a single colony of each strain was cultured in 1 mL of liquid LB medium at 30°C for 24 h. DNA was first extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) and further processed using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) to improve purity.
For shotgun sequencing, DNA library preparation was performed using the SATLite DNA Prep Kit with the SATLite 2.0 Library Prep Automation Device (GeneReach Biotechnology) and sequenced on a NovaSeq X Plus platform using the 10B Reagent Kit (Illumina) to obtain paired-end 150 bp reads. Raw reads were trimmed using fastp v1.0.1 (6), then assembled using SPAdes v3.15.0 (7) with the “--isolate” option (k = 21, 33, 55, and 77). Contigs longer than 500 bp were retained. Trimmed reads were mapped back to the contigs using BWA v0.7.17-r1188 (8), and coverage was assessed using SAMtools v1.9 (9). For species identification, assemblies were compared to reference genomes in the NCBI RefSeq database (10) using FastANI v1.33 (11). Assemblies showing >95% average nucleotide identity to a type strain were assigned to the species level; others were identified to the genus level. Assemblies were submitted to GenBank and annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.10 (12). Completeness and contamination were estimated using CheckM v1.2.4 (13).
Table 1 lists the metadata (collection date, location, host plant, and species assignment), assembly and annotation statistics, and NCBI accession numbers for each strain. These include one Paenarthrobacter sp. strain, two Pantoea ananatis strains, and four Pseudomonas sp. strains. Contig counts ranged from 27 to 100, N50 ranged from 113 to 339 kb, assembly sizes ranged from 4.53 to 5.67 Mb, GC content ranged from 53.4 to 66.1%, number of annotated genes ranged from 4,219 to 5,202, and all assemblies showed >94.5% completeness and <2% contamination.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Orozco-Mosqueda M del C, Glick BR. 2016. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 183:92–99. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.00826805622 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Hwang H-H, Chien P-R, Huang F-C, Hung S-H, Kuo C-H, Deng W-L, Chiang E-P, Huang C-C. 2021. A plant endophytic bacterium, Burkholderia seminalis strain 869T 2, promotes plant growth in Arabidopsis, Pak Choi, Chinese Amaranth, Lettuces, and other vegetables. Microorganisms 9:1703. doi:10.3390/microorganisms 908170334442782 PMC 8401003 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Hwang H-H, Chien P-R, Huang F-C, Yeh P-H, Hung S-H, Deng W-L, Huang C-C. 2022. A plant endophytic bacterium Priestia megaterium strain BP-R 2 isolated from the halophyte Bolboschoenus planiculmis enhances plant growth under salt and drought stresses. Microorganisms 10:2047. doi:10.3390/microorganisms 1010204736296323 PMC 9610499 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Hwang H-H, Huang Y-T, Chien P-R, Huang F-C, Wu C-L, Chen L-Y, Hung S-H, Pan I-C, Huang C-C. 2025. A plant endophytic bacterium Burkholderia seminalis strain 869T 2 increases plant growth under salt stress by affecting several phytohormone response pathways. Bot Stud 66:7. doi:10.1186/s 40529-025-00453-339904843 PMC 11794907 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Ho Y-N, Chiang H-M, Chao C-P, Su C-C, Hsu H-F, Guo C, Hsieh J-L, Huang C-C. 2015. In planta biocontrol of soilborne Fusarium wilt of banana through a plant endophytic bacterium, Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T 2. Plant Soil 387:295–306. doi:10.1007/s 11104-014-2297-0 · doi ↗
- 6Chen S. 2023. Ultrafast one‐pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. i Meta 2:e 107. doi:10.1002/imt 2.10738868435 PMC 10989850 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SP Ades de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e 102. doi:10.1002/cpbi.10232559359 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp 32419451168 PMC 2705234 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
