Draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis IBB2, a candidate probiotic strain isolated from bovine milk
Anastasiya Vasileuskaya, Agnieszka K. Szczepankowska, Jan Gawor, Magdalena Chmielewska-Jeznach, Tamara Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk

TL;DR
This paper presents the draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis IBB2, a potential probiotic strain from bovine milk.
Contribution
The study provides a new draft genome sequence for a candidate probiotic strain of Lactococcus lactis.
Findings
The genome was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq, resulting in 124 contigs.
The total genome size is 2,646,375 base pairs.
Abstract
We report the draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis IBB2, a candidate probiotic strain with potential probiotic properties. The genome was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq, yielding 124 contigs totaling 2,646,375 bp. This genome provides a valuable resource for comparative genomics and probiogenomic analyses of this strain.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Feature | Value |
|---|---|
| Total reads | 779,179 |
| Total bases | 265,923,938 nt |
| Coverage (mean) | 98.8× |
| Number of contigs | 124 |
| Total genome size | 2,646,375 bp |
| Minimum contig length | 207 bp |
| Maximum contig length | 388,420 bp |
| Average contig length | 21,342 bp |
| N50 | 116,610 bp |
| L50 | 6 contigs |
| GC content | 35.0% |
| Ambiguous bases (Ns) | 0 |
| Genes (total) | 2,788 |
| Protein-coding genes (CDS) | 2,650 |
| rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S) | 4 (1, 1, 2) |
| tRNA genes | 54 |
| Other noncoding RNAs | 3 |
| Pseudogenes | 77 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbiotics and Fermented Foods · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Gut microbiota and health
ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactococcus lactis IBB2, a bovine milk isolate, was identified in a screening effort focused on functional probiotic traits, including potential health-related activities. To facilitate genomic mining of this strain, we sequenced its genome.
The strain was originally isolated in the late 1990s from raw bovine milk that had been aseptically collected in Poland for routine dairy microbiology studies. The sampling did not involve live animals or experimental procedures. According to ASM animal-use guidelines (https://journals.asm.org/animal-use), the isolation of L. lactis IBB2 from raw bovine milk is exempt from Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee review. Raw milk was transported on ice to the laboratory and processed within 6 h of collection. Ten-fold serial dilutions were prepared in sterile phosphate-buffered saline, and 100 µL aliquots of appropriate dilutions were spread on glucose-M17 agar (Oxoid). Plates were incubated aerobically at 30°C for 24–48 h. A single typical Lactococcus colony was picked for further purification and preservation at –80°C in GM17 broth supplemented with 20% (vol/vol) glycerol. The culture used for DNA extraction was derived from this stock after no more than two passages. Bacterial cultures were grown aerobically in glucose-M17 broth (Oxoid) for 16 hours at 30°C under static conditions. Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 mL of culture using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/lysozyme protocol (1), optimized to preserve high-molecular-weight DNA without commercial kits. Cells were treated with lysozyme (20 mg/mL, 37°C, 30 min), followed by proteinase K digestion and CTAB-based lysis. DNA was extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, precipitated, ethanol-washed, and treated with RNase A. DNA quality was verified by spectrofluorometry and gel electrophoresis.
Illumina sequencing libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II FS kit (New England Biolabs, UK) and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 300 bp paired-end, v3 600-cycle chemistry). Raw reads were quality-checked using FastQC v0.12.0 (2) and trimmed with fastp v0.23.2 (3). The sequencing run for IBB2 yielded 779,179 reads totaling 265,923,938 nt. The draft genome was assembled de novo using Unicycler v0.4.8 (https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler), resulting in 124 contigs totaling 2,646,375 bp, with a minimum contig size of 207 bp and a maximum of 388,420 bp. The average contig length was 21,342 bp, and the GC content was 35.0%. The mean genome sequencing coverage was 98.8×. No ambiguous bases (non-ACGT) were present. N50 and L50 values were 116,610 bp and six contigs, respectively. Annotation was performed with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.6 (4). PGAP annotation predicted 2,788 genes in total, including 2,650 protein-coding genes, 4 rRNA genes, 54 tRNA genes, and 3 other noncoding RNAs (Table 1). Default parameters were used for all software (FastQC v0.12.0, fastp v0.23.2, Unicycler v0.4.8, and PGAP v6.6) unless otherwise specified.
The availability of the L. lactis IBB2 genome will facilitate comparative genomics and probiogenomic analyses aimed at elucidating potential mechanisms underlying the probiotic properties of this strain.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Wilson K. 2001. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2:Unit. doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb 0204 s 5618265184 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Andrews S. 2010. Fast QC: a quality control tool for high-throughput sequence data. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
- 3Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. bio Rxiv. doi:10.1101/274100 PMC 612928130423086 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Tatusova T, Di Cuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw 56927342282 PMC 5001611 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
