# Rapid detection of antimicrobial residues in broiler meat using flow cytometry-driven multiplex immunoassay

**Authors:** Francesca Tiziana Cannizzo, Federica Sini, Sara Divari, Matteo Cuccato, Alessia Poggi, Sara Panseri, Maria Nobile, Luca Maria Chiesa, Fulvio Riondato

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1636223 · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025-10-30

## TL;DR

This study tests a fast and affordable method to detect antibiotic residues in chicken meat using flow cytometry, which could improve food safety monitoring.

## Contribution

The study introduces Beadyplex flow cytometry as a field-applicable, rapid screening method for specific antimicrobial residues in broiler meat.

## Key findings

- Beadyplex showed high sensitivity and specificity for thiamphenicol and sulphadiazine detection.
- The assay demonstrated substantial agreement with HPLC-HRMS reference methods for these antimicrobials.
- Amoxicillin residues were not detected by Beadyplex in treated samples.

## Abstract

The misuse of antimicrobials (AMs) in poultry production contributes significantly to the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Despite legislative efforts within the European Union (EU) to reduce AM use, Italy remains among the countries with the highest consumption levels. Effective and accessible screening tools for AMs residues in poultry meat are crucial for food safety monitoring and regulatory compliance. This study evaluates the performance of the Beadyplex flow cytometric assay as a field-applicable method to detect residues of thiamphenicol, sulphadiazine, and amoxicillin in broiler chicken skeletal muscle.

Pectoralis major muscle samples were collected from 41 male broiler chickens (Ross 308) previously treated with thiamphenicol (n = 11), sulphadiazine (n = 6), amoxicillin (n = 12), or untreated (controls, n = 12). Beadyplex assays were performed following manufacturer instructions, and results were acquired using a standard flow cytometer. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and kappa agreement were calculated to assess the performance of the test in recognizing the AMs treatment. The agreement with the current reference method for detecting AM residues (high-performance liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry, or HPLC-HRMS) was also calculated.

The Beadyplex assay demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for thiamphenicol (Se = 1.00; Sp = 0.83; k = 0.791) and sulphadiazine (Se = 1.00; Sp = 0.91; k = 0.813), with substantial to almost perfect agreement with HPLC-HRMS results (k = 0.706 and 0.827, respectively). Amoxicillin residues were not detected in any treated sample by Beadyplex.

The Beadyplex assay offers a promising, cost-effective, and rapid screening complementary to confirmatory analysis for detecting selected AM residues in poultry meat. Its substantial agreement with reference methods and ease of use with standard cytometers support its potential application in field-based veterinary surveillance and food safety programs.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** thiamphenicol (PubChem CID 27200), sulphadiazine (PubChem CID 5215), amoxicillin (PubChem CID 33613)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** sulphadiazine (MESH:D013411), Amoxicillin (MESH:D000658), thiamphenicol (MESH:D013839)
- **Species:** Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12613232/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12613232/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12613232/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12613232