# Comparison of Jump-Landing Biomechanics during and after Fatigue: Investigation on the Optimal Timing of Screenings under Fatigue

**Authors:** Stefan Vermeulen, Camilla De Bleecker, Valentien Spanhove, Veerle Segers, Tine Willems, Philip Roosen, Roel De Ridder, Jos Vanrenterghem

PMC · DOI: 10.5114/jhk/200421 · Journal of Human Kinetics · 2025-07-21

## TL;DR

This study examines how volleyball players' jump-landing movements change during and after fatigue, offering guidance on when to conduct injury risk assessments.

## Contribution

The study introduces a decision tree to guide optimal timing for biomechanical screenings during or after fatigue.

## Key findings

- Fatigue significantly alters pelvis-trunk and lower limb joint angles during spike jump-landings.
- Kinematic changes are more pronounced during fatigue compared to after fatigue.
- A decision tree is proposed to inform screening timing based on biomechanical alterations.

## Abstract

Fatigue has been considered a risk factor for sports injuries, modulating full-body jump-landing biomechanics. Biomechanical assessments of jump-landing manoeuvres are typically performed before and after short-term fatigue protocols, but changes during the protocol are often neglected. Therefore, this study investigated spike jump-landing strategy alterations during and following a short-term fatigue protocol in volleyball. Forty-three healthy, adult, male volleyball players participated in this study. Three-dimensional full-body kinematics were collected when performing spike jump-landings before, during and after a short-term fatigue protocol specific for volleyball. Full-body sagittal plane joint angles were calculated and analysed with curve analysis using one-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired sample t-tests to investigate fatigue effects (p < 0.05). A significant main effect of fatigue was found for all kinematic variables (p = 0.015−0.041). More specifically, more pelvis-trunk flexion and less hip, knee, and ankle (dorsi-) flexion were observed during and after the protocol compared to baseline (p = 0.001−0.003). Moreover, less hip and knee flexion was observed during the protocol compared to after fatigue (p = 0.001−0.005). In conclusion, significant kinematic changes were found with fatigue, and these were somehow more pronounced during fatigue, possibly due to decreased attention towards the jump-landing task execution. A decision tree was provided to help researchers, coaches and/or clinicians in determining whether screenings should be better performed during or after fatigue, based on practical considerations.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** injuries (MESH:D014947), Fatigue (MESH:D005221)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12612828/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12612828/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12612828/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12612828