This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTION: Systems Pharmacology Reveals the Mechanism of Activity of Physalis alkekengi L. var. Franchetii Against Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Acute Lung Injury
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants · Andrographolide Research and Applications · Cell death mechanisms and regulation
RETRACTION: Y. Yang, Z.
Ding, Y.
Wang, R.
Zhong, Y.
Feng, T.
Xia, Y.
Xie, B.
Yang, X Sun. and Z. Shu , “Systems Pharmacology Reveals the Mechanism of Activity of Physalis alkekengi L. var. Franchetii Against Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Acute Lung Injury,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24, no. 9 (2020): 5039–5056, 10.1111/jcmm.15126.32220053 PMC7205831
The above article, published online on 27 March 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, Stefan N. Constantinescu; the Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following an investigation into concerns raised by a third party. The investigation confirmed that western blot bands presented in Figures 4D and 5B were found to be duplicated in another article published earlier by a different group of authors. Furthermore, the duplicated bands were shown to represent different proteins. Although the authors cooperated with the investigation and were able to provide some new data from experiments conducted post publication, they were unable to provide the original blots or account for the duplication of the blots in a previous study. As a result, the editors consider the results and conclusions of this article to be invalid.