# Inflammatory markers from routine blood tests predict survival in multiple myeloma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Mengjiao Luo, Ling Qin, Yujie Li, Qianru Mei, Qiaoping Wu, Xudong Feng

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1669878 · Frontiers in Immunology · 2025-10-30

## TL;DR

This study finds that blood test markers like NLR and RDW can predict survival in multiple myeloma patients.

## Contribution

The study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate inflammatory blood markers as prognostic tools in multiple myeloma.

## Key findings

- Elevated NLR is strongly linked to worse overall and progression-free survival in multiple myeloma.
- High RDW and low LMR are also associated with poorer outcomes in MM patients.
- PLR, RPR, and HRR show inconsistent or no significant prognostic value in MM.

## Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy marked by abnormal plasma cell proliferation. Inflammatory indices derived from routine blood tests—such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR), and hemoglobin-to-RDW ratio (HRR)—have shown prognostic value across cancers. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate their prognostic significance in MM.

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified eligible studies through January 17, 2025. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s and Begg’s tests.

Twenty-seven studies including 5,009 MM patients were analyzed. Elevated NLR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS: HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.72–2.47) and progression-free survival (PFS: HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.32–2.19), as well as advanced disease stage (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.40–5.80). High RDW and low LMR were similarly linked to worse outcomes (RDW–OS: HR = 1.68; LMR–OS: HR = 0.58). PLR showed no significant association with prognosis. RPR and HRR results were inconsistent due to limited data.

NLR, LMR, and RDW are promising prognostic biomarkers in MM, with elevated NLR and RDW and decreased LMR indicating poorer outcomes. PLR, RPR, and HRR require further investigation. These routinely accessible indices may aid in clinical risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251105106, identifier CRD420251105106.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** multiple myeloma (MONDO:0009693)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancers (MESH:D009369), hematologic malignancy (MESH:D019337), MM (MESH:D009101), Inflammatory (MESH:D007249)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611959/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611959/full.md

## References

87 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611959/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611959