# Montmorillonite-based essential oil carrier and its effects on non-target species: an environmental perspective on its risk assessment

**Authors:** Sofia Machado, Catarina Ganilho, Tatiana Andreani, Rose Marie O. F. Sousa, Artur Ribeiro, Ruth Pereira

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1696913 · Frontiers in Toxicology · 2025-10-30

## TL;DR

This study assesses the environmental risks of a montmorillonite-based essential oil formulation, finding it toxic to aquatic and soil organisms despite being intended to reduce toxicity.

## Contribution

The study provides novel ecotoxicological data on a montmorillonite-essential oil formulation, revealing unexpected toxicity to non-target species.

## Key findings

- The nanoclay-EO formulation showed high toxicity to aquatic species Raphidocelis subcapitata and Daphnia magna.
- Soil invertebrate Folsomia candida reproduction was significantly reduced by the formulation.
- Soil microbial activity was stimulated, but this did not offset concerns about toxicity to non-target organisms.

## Abstract

Essential oils (EO), rich in bioactive metabolites with biocidal activity, present great potential for agricultural applications as new biopesticides. However, their high volatility and sensitivity to environmental conditions limits their application. To address these limitations, nanotechnology-based formulations have been developed, incorporating EO into natural clays such as montmorillonite (MMT). Due to its colloidal properties, high adsorption capacity, and modifiable surface, MMT serves as an effective carrier for stabilizing EO while controlling their release. Besides aiming to enhance EO efficacy, these MMT-based formulations also aim to minimize EO toxicity to non-target organisms.

In this study, the toxicity of Satureja montana EO (SM EO), of its dispersant agent Tween 20®, of the MMT nanoclay and of the nanoclay-EO formulation was evaluated using aquatic (Aliivibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Lemna minor and Daphnia magna), and terrestrial (Folsomia candida and soil microbiota) non-target model organisms, following standard protocols.

Among the tested species, R. subcapitata and D. magna, exhibited the highest sensitivity, with D. magna showing an EC50 of 0.011 mg mL-1 and a complete growth inhibition being observed for R. subcapitata at concentrations ≥0.021 mg mL-1, for the nanoclay-EO formulation. F. candida reproduction was also significantly reduced for all tested concentrations of the nanoclay-EO formulation. In contrast, it was observed a stimulatory effect on soil microbial activity particularly for dehydrogenase and acid phosphatase enzymes.

These findings suggest that the nanoclay-EO formulation did not reduce the toxicity of SM EO, and in some cases, may even raise ecotoxicological concerns, particularly for aquatic and soil invertebrates. This study highlights the importance of detailed ecotoxicological evaluations of biopesticide formulations based on plant-based and materials as essential oils, and other natural materials, as they cannot be assumed as safe compounds. To the best of our knowledge ecotoxicological data is limited for most of the EO including some that already in the market. Based on these results, the concentrations to be tested for efficacy against target organism (safe to non-target organism) should be lower than 0.007 mg mL-1.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Tween 20® (PubChem CID 443314), montmorillonite (PubChem CID 71586775)
- **Species:** Aliivibrio fischeri (taxon 668), Raphidocelis subcapitata (taxon 307507), Lemna minor (taxon 4472), Daphnia magna (taxon 35525), Folsomia candida (taxon 158441)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** MMT (MESH:D001546), EO (MESH:D009822), SM EO (-), Tween 20 (MESH:D011136)
- **Species:** Folsomia candida (species) [taxon 158441], Lemna minor (species) [taxon 4472], Aliivibrio fischeri (species) [taxon 668], Raphidocelis subcapitata (species) [taxon 307507], Daphnia magna (species) [taxon 35525]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611812/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611812/full.md

## References

71 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611812/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611812