# A qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption among Uruguayan adults using the social ecological model

**Authors:** Leandro Machín, Alejandra Girona, Silvina Salgado, Cecilia Marrero, Ana Giménez, María Rosa Curutchet, Gastón Ares

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1698481 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2025-10-30

## TL;DR

This study explores why Uruguayan adults don't eat enough fruits and vegetables and suggests ways to encourage healthier eating habits.

## Contribution

The study applies the Social Ecological Model to identify multilevel barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption in non-capital urban areas of Uruguay.

## Key findings

- Participants acknowledged health benefits but reported inadequate fruit and vegetable intake.
- Barriers included taste preferences, household income, and limited food variety.
- Proposed solutions emphasized education, marketing, and improving food access and affordability.

## Abstract

Fruit and vegetable consumption remains below public health recommendations worldwide. This study aimed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption among adults living in urban areas outside the capital city of Uruguay, and to identify strategies to promote intake.

The study relied on a generic qualitative study using focus group discussions. Five focus groups were conducted between October 2024 and April 2025 in three cities in Uruguay (Atlántida, Paysandú, and Tacuarembó), involving 50 adults aged 18 to 77 years, diverse in sociodemographic backgrounds. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, combining inductive identification of emergent categories from the interview transcripts with deductive coding based on the levels of influence of the Social Ecological Model.

Although participants widely recognized the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption, most reported inadequate intake and described challenges in sustaining regular consumption. Barriers emerged across multiple levels of influence, including individual (e.g., taste preferences, lack of motivation, limited cooking skills), interpersonal (e.g., household composition and income), and the food environment (e.g., high prices, limited variety). Participants proposed a range of strategies to promote fruit and intake, primarily emphasizing nutrition education and social marketing, but also suggesting interventions to enhance convenience, reduce costs, and improve access.

Findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions that move beyond individual-focused strategies to address broader environmental and structural determinants of dietary behavior. Adopting a food systems-oriented approach to fruit and vegetable promotion may enhance the relevance and effectiveness of public health initiatives.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** leg cramps (MESH:D009120), diabetes (MESH:D003920), cancer (MESH:D009369), osteoporosis (MESH:D010024), respiratory conditions (MESH:D012131), heart disease (MESH:D006331), acne (MESH:D000152)
- **Chemicals:** fruit and vegetable (-), potassium (MESH:D011188)
- **Species:** Solanum lycopersicum (tomato, species) [taxon 4081], Malus domestica (apple, species) [taxon 3750], Daucus carota (carrot, species) [taxon 4039], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Solanum tuberosum (potatoes, species) [taxon 4113], Brassica oleracea var. italica (asparagus broccoli, varietas) [taxon 36774], Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower, varietas) [taxon 3715], Oryza sativa (Asian cultivated rice, species) [taxon 4530], Allium cepa (onion, species) [taxon 4679]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611725/full.md

## References

85 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611725/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12611725