# Leadership and Faculty Burnout in Allied Healthcare Education: A Scoping Review

## TL;DR

This review explores how leadership styles, personality traits, and digital competence relate to burnout among allied healthcare educators.

## Contribution

The study maps the literature on leadership, personality, and digital competence in relation to faculty burnout in allied healthcare education.

## Key findings

- Transformational leadership is consistently linked to lower burnout rates among faculty.
- Emotional stability and extraversion are protective personality traits against burnout.
- Digital competence may act as a moderating factor in reducing burnout, though research is limited.

## Abstract

Background: Faculty burnout in allied healthcare education institutions represents a significant challenge with implications for educational quality, organizational effectiveness, and healthcare workforce development. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on the relationships between leadership approaches, faculty personality factors, and burnout within allied healthcare education, while examining digital competence as a potential moderating factor. Methods: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant studies published between 2010 and 2024. Studies examining burnout among allied healthcare educators in relation to leadership, personality traits, or digital competence were included. Data extraction captured study characteristics, methodological approaches, key findings, and theoretical frameworks. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Existing research indicates significant relationships between leadership styles and faculty burnout rates, with transformational leadership consistently associated with lower burnout scores. The literature reveals that individual personality traits demonstrate significant relationships with burnout vulnerability, with emotional stability and extraversion showing the strongest protective effects. Limited research has examined digital competence in relation to burnout, though emerging evidence suggests it may function as a moderating factor. Significant gaps exist in non-Western contexts and in understanding interaction effects between leadership, personality, and digital competence. Conclusions: The current literature supports the importance of leadership approaches that emphasize collaboration, faculty autonomy, recognition, and professional development opportunities in protecting against burnout in allied healthcare education settings. Digital competence represents a promising but understudied job resource that may mitigate burnout effects. Future research should explore cross-cultural variations, interaction effects between personal and organizational factors, and the effectiveness of interventions in reducing faculty burnout.