# Local-Scale Soil Heterogeneity Differentially Influenced Assimilative Branch Stoichiometry of Three Dominant Shrubs in a Central Asian Desert

## TL;DR

This study shows how small-scale soil differences affect the nutrient traits of three desert shrubs in Central Asia.

## Contribution

It reveals how local soil heterogeneity differentially influences shrub nutrient strategies, considering plant size.

## Key findings

- Soil nutrients and biocrust development improved from north to south in the study area.
- Species and site significantly influenced assimilative branch stoichiometry with a strong interaction.
- Nutrient traits of Ephedra przewalskii and Calligonum mongolicum were more correlated with soil factors than Haloxylon persicum.

## Abstract

Most traits of assimilative branches (ABs) present large spatial and interspecific differences; however, it is still unclear how small-scale soil heterogeneity influences nutrient traits in ABs under the same climatic conditions. The AB samples of Ephedra przewalskii (EP; small-sized), Calligonum mongolicum (CM; medium-sized), and Haloxylon persicum (HP; large-sized), as well as soil samples, were collected at three sites (north, middle, and south; within 65 km) in the southeastern Gurbantunggut Desert, China. The interspecific and inter-site differences in C:N:P:K stoichiometry and the relationships with soil properties were discussed. From north to south, soil nutrients and biocrust development improved, whereas coarse sand proportion decreased. Species and site markedly influenced ABs’ stoichiometry, with a significant interaction. At the species level, each stoichiometric trait differed among species. CM exhibited the lowest C:P and N:P, whereas HP had the highest N:P. At the site level, N:P and C:P of EP and CM increased from north to south, whereas HP changed unclearly. CM and HP had higher N–P scaling exponents, EP and CM exhibited a higher K allocation rate, resulting in the co-limitation of N and P for all species. The overall stoichiometric homeostasis ranked as follows: HP > CM > EP. The three shrubs were dispersed among each other in an ordination diagram based on nutrient metrics, with different distribution patterns. The nutrient traits in the ABs of EP and CM, rather than HP, were markedly correlated with most soil factors. Local-scale soil variation indeed influenced the nutrient strategies of desert shrubs; plant size might be another important factor.