Performance of Acoustic, Electro-Acoustic and Optical Sensors in Precise Waveform Analysis of a Plucked and Struck Guitar String
Jan Jasiński, Marek Pluta, Roman Trojanowski, Julia Grygiel, Jerzy Wiciak

TL;DR
This study compares how well different sensors capture the vibrations of a guitar string when plucked or struck, showing that each sensor has unique strengths and limitations.
Contribution
The paper introduces a detailed comparison of acoustic, electro-acoustic, and optical sensors for guitar string vibration analysis under varied excitation conditions.
Findings
Microphones capture overall sound but lack spatial selectivity and have lower SNR compared to other methods.
Magnetic pickups offer accurate, cost-effective string-specific measurements but have limited temporal fidelity.
Laser Doppler vibrometers provide high temporal fidelity but alter string vibrations due to the optical target's influence.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative performance analysis of three sensor technologies—microphone, magnetic pickup, and laser Doppler vibrometer—for capturing string vibration under varied excitation conditions: striking, plectrum plucking, and wire plucking. Two different magnetic pickups are included in the comparison. Measurements were taken at multiple excitation levels on a simplified electric guitar mounted on a stable platform with repeatable excitation mechanisms. The analysis focuses on each sensor’s capacity to resolve fine-scale waveform features during the initial attack while also taking into account its capability to measure general changes in instrument dynamics and timbre. We evaluate their ability to distinguish vibro-acoustic phenomena resulting from changes in excitation method and strength as well as measurement location. Our findings highlight the significant influence…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMusic Technology and Sound Studies · Music and Audio Processing · Speech and Audio Processing
