# Resilience and Perceived Social Support in Cancer Survivors: Validity, Levels, and Sociodemographic Correlates of CD-RISC-25 and MSPSS Scales

## TL;DR

This study explores resilience and social support in breast cancer survivors, finding moderate levels and a strong link between the two factors.

## Contribution

The study validates resilience and social support scales and identifies sociodemographic correlates in a Serbian breast cancer survivor cohort.

## Key findings

- Resilience and perceived social support were moderately high among breast cancer survivors.
- Resilience and social support were strongly correlated, with hardiness being the strongest domain.
- Urban residence and higher income were linked to higher resilience and social support.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: Resilience and perceived social support are crucial factors influencing psychological well-being among breast cancer survivors. Understanding their levels and interrelations can inform psychosocial interventions aimed at improving survivorship outcomes. This study aimed to examine the relationship between resilience and perceived social support, to evaluate the psychometric properties of the applied scales, and to explore their associations with key sociodemographic factors among breast cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: A total of 193 women in clinical remission, at least six months post-primary treatment, were recruited from the General Hospital Sombor. Participants completed sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires, the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlations, and group comparisons (t-tests and ANOVA) were conducted to assess the relationships among study variables and sociodemographic factors. Results: Participants demonstrated moderate resilience (57 ± 18), with Coping and Hardiness as the strongest domains and Optimism the lowest. Perceived social support was also moderate (4.65–4.82) across all domains, highest for family and significant others. Resilience and perceived social support were positively correlated (r = 0.616, p < 0.001), with Hardiness most strongly associated with overall resilience (r = 0.899). Support from a significant other was particularly linked to adaptability (r = 0.617). Participants living in urban areas and those with higher income reported significantly higher resilience and social support, though with low effect sizes. No other sociodemographic associations were observed. Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors in this Serbian cohort reported moderate resilience and social support, with a strong interrelationship between the two. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening social support networks as a potential pathway to enhance resilience and psychological well-being in cancer survivorship care.