Comparing the Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals and Cancer Patients Toward the Integration and Perceived Effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine

TL;DR

This study compares how healthcare professionals and cancer patients view the use of complementary and alternative medicine alongside traditional treatments.

Contribution

It reveals differences in attitudes and expectations between healthcare professionals and cancer patients regarding CAM integration and effectiveness.

Findings

Patients had a significantly more positive attitude toward CAM than healthcare professionals.

70% of respondents believed CAM should be integrated into evidence-based medicine.

Healthcare professionals, especially physicians, were more skeptical about CAM's effectiveness.

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly used to supplement evidence-based medicine (EBM), especially in the treatment of cancer patients. Objective: The study aimed to analyze the beliefs, attitudes, and expectations of healthcare professionals and cancer patients regarding the integration of CAM into the Western medical system, and to examine differences between these groups in their expectations for CAM effectiveness. The hypotheses were that there are no statistically significant differences in attitudes between healthcare professionals (nurses and physicians) and cancer patients regarding CAM integration into EBM and the effectiveness of CAM. Methods: The study was conducted on a stratified sample of 832 respondents: 411 cancer patients and 421 health professionals (100 physicians and 321 nurses). Validated questionnaires based on CHBQ and IMAQ instruments were used. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied in the analysis. Results: Patients showed a significantly more positive attitude toward CAM methods than healthcare professionals. A total of 70% of respondents believed that CAM should be integrated into EBM. Most respondents supported formally noting CAM therapies in medical records and including them in medical history. Healthcare professionals, especially physicians, expressed greater concerns about the effectiveness of CAM, while patients had more positive expectations about its benefits. Conclusions: The findings suggest that healthcare professionals require better education on CAM therapies and that greater openness is necessary to integrate these methods into medical practice. Although patients have high expectations for CAM, its inclusion in the formal medical system requires further research on safety and efficacy.