# Time of Care and Time of Dying: A Multidisciplinary Case Report on End-of-Life Experience Within the Italian Legal Framework

## TL;DR

This case study explores a cancer patient's end-of-life decisions within Italy's legal framework, emphasizing multidisciplinary care to support self-determination and dignity.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel approach to end-of-life care by integrating psychological, legal-ethical, and palliative care perspectives in a multidisciplinary team setting.

## Key findings

- Multidisciplinary teamwork can help patients maintain identity and dignity at the end of life.
- Respecting patient values and history is crucial in end-of-life decision-making.
- Effective end-of-life accompaniment requires collaboration among physicians, nurses, and psychologists.

## Abstract

In this segment of the Palliative Care Unit case series, we introduce a patient with a long history of oncological treatments for recurrent breast cancer. After active treatments and a global control of the neoplasm, disease progression made the patient access different lines of chemotherapies, even asking for them in anticipation of a few advantages in the balance between benefits and risks. When the patient decided to permanently discontinue chemotherapy, she felt she had disrupted her values. Also, as a reaction to breaking bad news without estimating alternative paths, she considered her deteriorating condition as the sole criterion for assisted dying in another country. Could this be a self-consistent choice for this patient, so determined to find and pursue possibilities in treatment previously? Should this clue respond precisely to the patient’s needs? This contribution’s objective is to debate possibilities of patient self-determination and dignity at the end of life by integrating psychological support, palliative care, and legal–ethical awareness. This case study presents multidisciplinary team work through some key turning points. This team work was carried out in a national context that is currently inconclusive regarding assisted suicide, since active euthanasia is illegal. At the same time, the national Constitutional Court (242/2019) recently opened the possibility of eventual medically assisted suicide under certain circumstances. In this case, health professionals considered this context and tried to delve deeply into respecting the patient’s identity in order to determine when and if the exceptional circumstances were met. This case highlights the ethical sense of end-of-life accompaniment, which when conducted by physicians, nurses, and psychologists together can lead to effective support and allow patients to maintain their identity and to express themselves respecting not only their fears but also their vision of themselves as human beings. A first key turning point was, for instance, taking into account the patient’s history and values, and a subsequent one was supporting the patient in exploring healthcare services and related end-of-life support. In a further key turning point, the patient was helped in engaging with physicians in order to understand types of continuous care, as well as the timing and expected results of sedation. Finally, she chose a healthcare service where she could spend the end of her life in fulfillment of her values. Overall, this case report illustrates how integrating psychological support, palliative care, and legal–ethical awareness can promote patient self-determination and dignity at the end of life.