Dosimetric Impact of Air Gaps in High-Dose-Rate Contact Interventional Radiotherapy (Modern Brachytherapy) for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer of the Ear

TL;DR

This study examines how air gaps affect radiation dose delivery in modern brachytherapy for ear skin cancer.

Contribution

The study evaluates the dosimetric impact of air gaps in HDR IRT for NMSC of the ear using two dose calculation formalisms.

Findings

CTV coverage was comparable between TG-43 and TG-186 formalisms.

Increasing air gaps reduced skin dose progressively up to ~15% at 5 mm.

Small air pockets (<1 mm) did not alter global dosimetric metrics significantly.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The anatomical complexity of the auricular region poses a unique challenge for contact interventional radiotherapy (IRT, modern brachytherapy), especially in maintaining close conformity between the applicator and skin surface. Air gaps can arise due to the irregular shape of the ear, potentially compromising dose coverage. This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of air gaps in HDR IRT for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) of the ear. Methods: Ten patients treated with contact IRT using alginate as supporting material were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment plans were recalculated using both the TG-43 and the TG-186 formalism. CTV coverage and organ-at-risk dose parameters were evaluated within the two formalisms. Results: CTV coverage was comparable between algorithms (mean V95% 96.2% vs. 94.4%, V100% 89.6% vs. 86.7%, and V150% 2.6% vs. 2.5% for TG-43 vs. TG-186; p > 0.05), while the ipsilateral eye D2cc decreased from 4.0% (TG-43) to 3.2% (TG-186). In silico simulations showed that increasing air gaps reduced skin dose progressively (up to ~15% at 5 mm), whereas alginate thickness produced only a mild dose increase (<5%) across the tested range. Overall, small air pockets (<1 mm) did not substantially alter global dosimetric metrics, although local underdosage may occur at gap locations. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of accounting for material heterogeneities and geometric uncertainties in anatomically complex regions through advanced dose calculation algorithms.

Figures