Assessment of the Winter Wheat Yield Gap for Smallholder Farmers in the Loess Plateau via Boundary Line Analysis
Jing-Jing Han, Xian-Ping Xia, Hao Liu, Jia-Hui Wang, Ze-Wei Qi, Yue-Chao Wang, Wen Lin, Zhi-Qiang Gao, Shou-Tian Ma, Jian-Fu Xue

TL;DR
This study identifies soil factors limiting winter wheat yields for smallholder farmers in China's Loess Plateau and suggests optimal nutrient ranges to improve productivity.
Contribution
The study introduces boundary line analysis as a novel method to identify optimal soil nutrient ranges in heterogeneous smallholder farming systems.
Findings
Soil available phosphorus showed the highest variability among nutrients, with a coefficient of variation of 67.1%.
Optimal ranges for soil organic matter and available phosphorus were identified as crucial for maximizing wheat yields.
Parabolic relationships between soil nutrients and yield were found, defining specific optimal thresholds for each nutrient.
Abstract
Closing the yield gap in smallholder farming systems requires precise identification of key limiting factors. This study addresses this need by applying boundary line analysis (BLA) to diagnose primary soil constraints to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield across 95 smallholder farms in the Loess Plateau of China. The BLA approach effectively delineates optimum nutrient ranges amidst inherent field variability, offering a novel methodological advantage for heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. The results showed that, regarding variability, the coefficients of variation for productive spike number and grain yield were considerably greater than those for kernels per spike and thousand-kernel weight. Soil available phosphorus showed the highest coefficient of variation (67.1%), 1.8–2.2 times greater than that of soil organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, and available…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoil Geostatistics and Mapping · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Climate change impacts on agriculture
