Role of Palliative Care in Onco-Hematology Retrospective Observational Cohort Study in Deceased In-Hospital Patients with SACT at the End of Life: Experience with Real-World Data from a Cancer Monographic Institution

TL;DR

This study examines how palliative care is used in onco-hematology and finds differences in care between solid tumors and blood cancers.

Contribution

The study provides real-world data on palliative care referral patterns and outcomes in onco-hematology, highlighting differences between solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Findings

Palliative care referral rates differ significantly between solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Patients in palliative care had better documentation of psycho-emotional symptoms and lower blood transfusion use.

Late referrals to palliative care occurred in nearly 30% of cases, with no major difference between tumor types.

Abstract

This study aims to provide a better understanding of the profile of patients referred to palliative care (PC) and, also, what PC provides them. We used the Mortality Subcommittee database, which records hospital deaths of patients who have received SACT in their last month of life. We complemented the information of the registry with some variables of palliative care activity. We present here the comparative results between patients included or not included in Palliative Care Program (PCP) and between pathologies: solid tumor (ST) vs. hematological malignancies (HM). We found important differences between ST and HM, showing that they are very different pathologies and require different palliative approaches. Finally, we put forward some recommendations.

Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established recommendations for palliative care (PC), and they still remain the most trusted source overall. The standard published by C. Earle (defined in solid tumors) for referral to PC is > 55%. However, these rates remain unclear in general onco-hematology. Our referral rate reaches 60%; while it meets the standard, there are significant differences between ST and HM. Several authors have already pointed out these discrepancies. Arguing in some cases its possible relationship with the different behavior of professionals with different pathologies. Objective: The primary objective of this work is to understand the role that PC plays in onco-hematology and to determine the profile of patients referred to PC. Therefore, the article aims to establish some recommendations related to the results of prevalent characteristics. Methods: The Mortality Subcommittee (MS) includes and registers in a database all cancer patients who died in hospital undergoing systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) in their last 30 days of life (SACT ≤ 30 d). PC, in turn, works on relieving symptoms related to the disease and the patient. To understand the impact of PC in the MS database patients, we reviewed the literature for symptoms related to palliative care activity. Subsequently, we selected some signs and symptoms, by consensus with our PC specialists, in order to add them to the MS database and register them retrospectively. We measured the percentage of patients who registered these symptoms based on the data found in their electronic records. The results include the comparison by group: between patients referred or not to the PC program (PCP), and between the pathologies ST and HM. We used the programming language R (version 4.2) in our statistical analysis, including the “compareGroups” package (version 4.6), applying the pertinent tests based on the distribution of the data. Results: We completed the records on the 1681 patients from the period 2020–2023. 59.4% were men, the average age was 65.5 years, and 73.5% had ST and 26.5% had HM. Patients with lung cancer predominate (28.5%), with 71% of them being in the stage IV, followed by leukemia (9.76%). 60% are in progression of their disease, and 77% have advanced disease (AD). The average therapeutic aggressiveness indicators were SACT < 30 d: 38.9% (ST: 33.4%; HM: 70.97%); SACT < 14 d: 16.36% (ST: 13.76%; HM: 31.56%); the change in therapeutic regimen was 22% (ST: 20.8%; HM: 25.1%). The referral rate to PCP was 59.7% (ST: 68.2% and HM: 36.3%). Late referral (PCP ≤3 days before death) occurred in 29.2% of all patients, being 29% for ST cases and 30.4% for HM cases. Regarding the recording of signs and symptoms: psycho-emotional and analgesia regimens (including opioids) are better recorded in the PCP group (p < 0.001); the more physical symptoms (dyspnea, bleeding, infections, and severe symptoms) do not present statistically significant differences, although the severe symptoms in the PCP group are more disabling (cerebral involvement, spinal cord compression, vertebral crushing). The number of bags of blood products transfused is significantly lower in the PCP group (average 6.9 vs. 12.7). The total number of symptom variables with significant statistical differences was 13 for ST and 8 for HM. Conclusions: In this cohort, patients visited by PC had a better record of psycho-emotional symptoms. We consider that patients who are in any of the following situations should be referred to PC: initial diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer, leukemia; patients with advanced disease; presence of pain requiring opioids; psychoemotional symptoms; need for >7 to 15 transfusions of blood products and, if there are disabling symptoms. PC improves professional interest in the psycho-emotional and fragility situation of these patients. According to our data (in terms of the number of variables with significant differences by pathology group), we observed that hematologists tend to take on palliative tasks more frequently than their oncologist peers, who delegate them to PC in order to have more time dedicated to their specific field.

Figures