# Neuropsychological Assessments to Explore the Cognitive Impact of Cochlear Implants: A Scoping Review

## TL;DR

This review explores how cochlear implants affect cognition, showing improvements in memory and global cognition, but highlights the need for better tools to study these effects.

## Contribution

The paper synthesizes evidence on cognitive outcomes of cochlear implants and their relationship with speech perception and quality of life.

## Key findings

- Cochlear implants significantly improved cognition, particularly memory and global cognition in longitudinal studies.
- Speech intelligibility interacts with cognitive subdomains like global cognition and executive function.
- Quality of life, social engagement, and mental health improvements are commonly observed in CI users.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss constitutes a modifiable risk factor for dementia. Auditory rehabilitation with devices such as cochlear implants (CIs) has been reported to prevent cognitive decline in older adults. However, post-implant cognitive effects remain highly heterogeneous across studies. Thus, the aim of this review is to synthesize the evidence on cognitive outcomes and their interplay with speech perception, quality of life (QoL), and psychological status. Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines from January 2015 to July 2025. Studies were eligible if they included adult CI candidates who completed cognitive and audiometric assessments. In total, 43 studies, including longitudinal and cross-sectional designs, were reviewed. Several studies also assessed hearing aid (HA) users and normal-hearing (NH) controls. Principal results were identified and analyzed across cognitive domains, audiological performance, QoL, and psychological outcomes. Results: CIs significantly improved cognition across longitudinal studies, with a higher number of assessments reporting gains in memory (61%), global cognition (57%), and executive function (46%); while attention, language, and visuospatial skills were less frequently evaluated. Though findings are not fully consistent, interactions between speech intelligibility and cognitive subdomains have also been found in several studies: global cognition (25%), executive function (22%), visuospatial skills (20%), attention (21%), language (17%), and memory (12%). Improvements in QoL, social engagement, depression, and anxiety are frequently observed. Conclusions: The lack of unified and adapted neurocognitive tools may prevent the observation of consistent outcomes across studies. Further research and multimodal data are still needed to fully understand the interaction between cognition, speech intelligibility, and QoL in CI users.