# Evaluating the Impact of the Health Navigator Model on Housing Status Among People Experiencing Homelessness in Four European Countries

**Authors:** Juan Esteban Guzman-Benitez, Tobias Fragner, Tamara Alhambra-Borrás, Ascensión Doñate-Martínez, Vicent Blanes-Selva, Juan M. García-Gómez, Simona Barbu, Julia Gawronska, Maria Moudatsou, Ioanna Tabaki, Katerina Belogianni, Pania Karnaki, Miguel Rico Varadé, Rosa Gómez-Trenado, Jaime Barrio-Cortes, Lee Smith, Alejandro Gil-Salmerón, Igor Grabovac

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13212805 · Healthcare · 2025-11-04

## TL;DR

This study found that a health navigator program helped improve housing stability for homeless people in four European countries.

## Contribution

The study evaluates how a health navigator model impacts housing status among homeless individuals across four European countries.

## Key findings

- Time in the health navigator program was linked to improved housing status for participants.
- Migrants without legal documents showed the largest housing improvements.
- Daily smoking was associated with lower odds of housing improvement.

## Abstract

Background: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face significant health disparities and systemic barriers to healthcare, elevating their risk for cancer and other chronic diseases. To tackle PEHs’ challenges in accessing cancer preventive care, the CANCERLESS project implemented the Health Navigator Model (HNM)—a person-centered intervention that utilizes trained Health Navigators to provide tailored support and facilitate service access. Recognizing housing as a key determinant of health, this analysis assessed changes in housing status associated with participation in the HNM among CANCERLESS participants in Austria, Greece, Spain, and the UK. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of cross-national data collected during a single-arm interventional study. Of 652 enrolled PEH, 277 (42.5%) completed the HNM intervention follow-up and were included in the analysis. Changes in housing status from baseline to follow-up were categorized using the European Typology of Homelessness and Housing Exclusion (ETHOS) and treated as an ordered outcome. Descriptive statistics were complemented by a cumulative link mixed model with a participant random intercept to estimate the association between time (follow-up vs. baseline) and housing transitions among completers, adjusting for age, residence/legal status, and daily smoking. Results: Participants had a mean age of 47.4 (SD 13.8), primarily identified as male (64.1%), reported upper secondary education (33.9%), and were from Western European countries (39.7%), with varying housing situations. Among intervention completers, time (follow-up vs. baseline) was associated with higher odds of being in a higher ETHOS category (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.02–2.20, p = 0.042), consistent with a modest improvement in housing status. Larger estimates were observed among migrants without legal documents (OR = 24.13, 95% CI = 6.41–90.89, p < 0.001), while daily smoking was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.11–0.96, p = 0.041); other residence status categories were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Suggesting that tailored, navigation-based models, such as the HNM, may be linked to improved housing stability for PEH, these findings can inform piloting and context-aligned integration of the HNM within public health strategies as an alternative approach to address the complex, interconnected health and social needs of PEH. However, the lack of a comparison group and high attrition limit the results’ conclusiveness, and future evaluations should aim to include assessments of housing-associated contextual factors.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), chronic diseases (MESH:D002908), PEH (MESH:C000719191)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12607378/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12607378/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12607378/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12607378