# From Vision to Reality: Five Years of the Botanical Safety Consortium

**Authors:** Constance A. Mitchell, Amy L. Roe, Scott Auerbach, Cécile Bascoul, Michelle Embry, Stephen Ferguson, Stefan Gafner, Matthias Gossmann, Bill J. Gurley, Holly Johnson, Olaf Kelber, Julie Krzykwa, Jacob Larson, Yitong Liu, Catherine Mahony, Andre Monteiro da Rocha, Stefan Pfuhler, Vincent Sica, Suramya Waidyanatha, Remco H. S. Westerink, Kristine Witt, Hellen Oketch-Rabah, Cynthia Rider

PMC · DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2025.2583832 · Pharmaceutical Biology · 2025-11-09

## TL;DR

The Botanical Safety Consortium has developed new methods to assess the safety of plant-based products, aiming to modernize testing and support public health.

## Contribution

The paper presents a collaborative framework for evaluating new toxicity testing methods tailored for botanicals.

## Key findings

- Early findings identified screening tools suitable for botanical testing with some specific considerations.
- Working groups evaluated in vitro, in silico, and organism-based methods for botanical hazard assessment.
- The framework addresses multiple toxicological endpoints like hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity.

## Abstract

Botanicals, including products derived from plants, fungi, and algae, are increasingly consumed worldwide. Their complex compositions and variable phytochemical profiles present significant challenges for safety assessment. Traditional toxicology methods are time and resource intensive, and the variability of botanicals makes it difficult to test one lot as representative.

The Botanical Safety Consortium (BSC), launched in 2019, was established to advance fit-for-purpose toxicity testing strategies for botanicals. This manuscript summarizes the progress of the BSC, with emphasis on the activities of its Working Groups.

The BSC Working Groups evaluate established new approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro assays, in silico models, and non-protected whole organisms such as C. elegans, for their applicability to botanical hazard assessment. Case studies of botanicals were selected based on known toxicity profiles to test assay performance and determine whether botanicals behave differently from single chemicals in these systems.

The evaluations address toxicological endpoints such as hepatotoxicity, genotoxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and dermal toxicity. Early findings have identified fit-for-purpose screening tools that can generally be applied to botanical testing, with some nuances and considerations.

Future work will focus on refining and enhancing the tool-kit through assay refinement, filling endpoint gaps with additional assays, and incorporating ADME data and in silico modeling approaches. This collaborative, science-driven framework aims to modernize botanical safety evaluation, address regulatory needs, and ultimately protect public health while supporting the global demand for botanical-based dietary supplements, cosmetics, and other products.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cardiotoxicity (MESH:D066126), neurotoxicity (MESH:D020258), toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Species:** PX clade (clade) [taxon 569578], C. elegans [taxon 328850]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12604121/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12604121/full.md

## References

49 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12604121/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12604121