# Multi-Cohort Federated Learning Shows Synergy in Mortality Prediction for MRI-Based and Metabolomics-Based Age Scores

**Authors:** Pedro Mateus, Swier Garst, Jing Yu, Davy Cats, Alexander G. J. Harms, Mahlet Birhanu, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Marcel Reinders, Jeroen van der Grond, Andre Dekker, Jacobus F. A. Jansen, Magdalena Beran, Miranda T. Schram, Pieter Jelle Visser, Justine Moonen, Mohsen Ghanbari, Gennady Roshchupkin, Dina Vojinovic, Inigo Bermejo, Hailiang Mei, Esther E. Bron

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6 · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · 2025-07-30

## TL;DR

This study uses federated learning to combine brain MRI and metabolomics data from multiple cohorts to better predict biological age and mortality risk.

## Contribution

The study introduces a federated learning approach to synergistically combine BrainAge and MetaboAge for mortality prediction.

## Key findings

- Federated learning improved BrainAge prediction accuracy across cohorts compared to local models.
- BrainAge and MetaboAge showed complementary predictive values for mortality risk.
- BrainAge and MetaboAge had only weak direct associations but synergistically predicted mortality.

## Abstract

While biological age scores have been shown to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers, interactions between different age scores are largely unknown. To study this, large-scale multi-modal data are crucial. However, such data are scarce as population-based cohorts are generally restricted in sharing their data. Here, we employ federated learning to study the relationship between the two types of biological age scores: BrainAge based on brain MRI and MetaboAge based on metabolites. Using three large population-based cohorts, we trained a federated deep learning model to estimate BrainAge and compared its performance to models trained in a single cohort. The federated BrainAge model yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts than locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts further improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge and MetaboAge by performing association analysis and survival analysis for dementia and mortality prediction to further characterize both scores. The association analysis showed a weak association between BrainAge and MetaboAge, while the survival analysis indicated complementary predictive values for the mortality risk of the two scores. Federated learning has been shown to be a valuable technique for enabling the use of research cohorts that are restricted in data sharing. We conclude that BrainAge and MetaboAge act synergetically for the prediction of time to all-cause mortality, and both aging scores capture different aspects of the aging process.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** dementia (MONDO:0001627)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** dementia (MESH:D003704)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602841/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602841/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602841/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602841