# In vitro ablation rates of Ho:YAG, p-Tm:YAG and TFL lasers

**Authors:** A. Quarà, A. Bravo-Balado, S. Moretto, A. Madden, F. Zorzi, L. M. I. Jannello, S. Kutchukian, J. Cabrera, M. Corrales, M. Chicaud, U. Gradilone, L. Candela, C. Gorny, F. Coste, L. Berthe, S. Doizi, F. Panthier, C. Fiori, O. Traxer

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-06001-9 · World Journal of Urology · 2025-11-10

## TL;DR

This study compares how well three types of lasers break apart kidney stones in a lab setting, finding that the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is the most efficient.

## Contribution

The study introduces a standardized robotic setup to compare ablation rates of Ho:YAG, p-Tm:YAG, and TFL lasers for kidney stone treatment.

## Key findings

- TFL showed the highest ablation rates for both hard and soft kidney stones.
- p-Tm:YAG outperformed Ho:YAG at certain energy settings but was less efficient than TFL.
- Larger fiber diameters improved ablation efficiency at lower energy settings for p-Tm:YAG.

## Abstract

This study compares the ablation rates of three laser systems—Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL), and Pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG)—for renal stone lithotripsy using a standardized robotic setup.

A robotic arm enabled consistent laser application on stone phantoms simulating calcium oxalate monohydrate (hard) and uric acid (soft) stones. Ablation efficiency (mm³/J) was assessed across different laser settings (0.2 J–50 Hz, 0.5 J–20 Hz, and 1.0 J–10 Hz) and fiber diameters (200 and 272 μm). Ablated volumes were quantified via micro-CT and 3D segmentation using 3DSlicer. Statistical analysis evaluated differences in performance.

TFL demonstrated the highest ablation rates for both hard and soft stones, significantly outperforming Ho:YAG in multiple settings. For hard stones, TFL exhibited greater ablation efficiency than Ho:YAG, particularly at 0.5 J–20 Hz and 1.0 J–10 Hz. The p-Tm:YAG laser also outperformed Ho:YAG at 0.5 J–20 Hz. For soft stones, the difference between TFL and Tm:YAG was statistically significant at lower energy settings (0.20 J–50 Hz and 0.5 J–20 Hz). Compared to Ho:YAG, TFL showed significantly higher ablation rates across all tested settings (p < 0.05). The p-Tm:YAG laser showed intermediate performance, with higher efficiency than Ho:YAG but slightly lower than TFL. Fiber diameter influenced ablation, with 272 μm fibers yielding greater efficiency at lower energy settings (p < 0.05 at 0.20 J − 50 Hz and 0.5 J − 20 Hz for both stone types); this comparison was limited to p-Tm:YAG, as data for the other lasers are already available in the literature.

TFL achieved the highest in vitro ablation efficiency. However, p-Tm:YAG represents a promising compromise, offering improved performance over Ho:YAG and a balanced profile between fragmentation and dusting capabilities.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** calcium oxalate monohydrate (PubChem CID 165350), uric acid (PubChem CID 1175)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** renal stone (MESH:D007669)
- **Chemicals:** uric acid (MESH:D014527), Ho:YAG (-), calcium oxalate monohydrate (MESH:D002129)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602604/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602604/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602604/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602604