Correction to: Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial
Mehmet Esref Ulutas, Abdullah Hilmi Yilmaz
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHernia repair and management · Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies · Stoma care and complications
Correction to: Hernia #####################
10.1007/s10029-025-03368-x
The dates in the Methods of the Abstract and Participants and Eligibility Criteria sections tions have been published incorrectly.
- Abstract Methods Section: **Between April 2023 and April 2024, 120 consecutive patients aged 65 years and older with inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the laparoscopic TEP group (n=60) and the open (Lichtenstein) procedure group (n=60).]**Should readAbstract Methods Section: Between October 2023 and December 2024, 120 consecutive patients aged 65 years and older with inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the laparoscopic TEP group (n=60) and the open (Lichtenstein) procedure group (n=60).]
- Participants and eligibility criteria section: The study population consisted of patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between April 2023 and April 2024.Should readParticipants and eligibility criteria section: The study population consisted of patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between October 2023 and December 2024.]