# The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Yue Zhou, Sanmao Liu, Shaochu Zheng, Jiahui Han, Haizhu Huang, Jinliang Kong

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1671018 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2025-10-28

## TL;DR

This study reviews the effectiveness and safety of Tislelizumab in treating advanced lung cancer, finding it improves short-term outcomes but not long-term survival.

## Contribution

A meta-analysis evaluating Tislelizumab's efficacy and safety in locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer patients.

## Key findings

- Tislelizumab showed higher objective response and disease control rates in randomized controlled trials.
- No significant improvement in overall or progression-free survival was observed.
- Tislelizumab had similar effects on non-small cell and small cell lung cancer subtypes.

## Abstract

The clinical role of Tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab in treating these patients through a meta-analysis.

Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to 19 May 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies assessing the efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab for locally advanced or metastatic LC were included. Literature screening and data extraction were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using STATA 15.0 software.

A total of 8 studies were included, of which 5 were RCTs and 3 were single-arm studies. In the RCT subgroup, the Tislelizumab group demonstrated a higher objective response rate (ORR) [OR = 2.29, 95%CI(1.43,3.64), P = 0.001] and disease control rate (DCR) [OR = 1.64, 95%CI(1.30,2.07), P < 0.001] compared to the control group, but no significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) [OR = 0.81, 95%CI(0.60,1.10), P = 0.179] or progression-free survival (PFS) [OR = 0.74, 95%CI(0.39,1.41), P = 0.364]. Single-arm study data indicated that Tislelizumab treatment achieved a high ORR [OR = 0.54, 95%CI (0.34,0.74), P < 0.001] and DCR [OR = 0.86, 95%CI (0.78,0.92), P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that Tislelizumab had similar effects on ORR and DCR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

The meta-analysis results suggest that Tislelizumab demonstrates significant short-term efficacy (ORR and DCR) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic LC. However, the existing evidence is inadequate to confirm its long-term survival benefits (OS and PFS), and more high-quality studies are needed for validation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** lung cancer (MONDO:0005138), non-small cell lung cancer (MONDO:0005233), small cell lung cancer (MONDO:0008433)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** LC (MESH:D008175), NSCLC (MESH:D002289), SCLC (MESH:D055752)
- **Chemicals:** Tislelizumab (MESH:C000707970)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602520/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602520/full.md

## References

95 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602520/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12602520