# Knowledge translation of climate change research into public health action: a scoping review

**Authors:** Chanelle Mulopo, Nyamongo Onkoba, Samuel Abimbola, Ezgi Baltaci, Caradee Y. Wright, Bey-Marrie Schmidt

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1632799 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2025-10-27

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how climate change research can be better translated into public health actions, highlighting key methods and gaps in global efforts.

## Contribution

The study identifies five knowledge translation approaches and emphasizes the lack of research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

## Key findings

- Five primary knowledge translation approaches were identified, including media monitoring and citizen engagement.
- No primary studies on climate change research and knowledge translation were found in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
- Advocacy, education, and health impact assessments are emphasized as key tools for effective decision-making.

## Abstract

There are gaps in translating climate change research into public health action at the global level. Knowledge translation refers to the methods used to bridge the gap between knowledge and action. Given the significant impacts of climate change on health, it is essential to integrate climate research into health decision-making processes. This integration ensures that evidence effectively informs policies and practices at all levels, leading to more timely, equitable, and impactful public health responses.

This scoping review examines key approaches and identifies gaps in knowledge translation methods for integrating climate change research into public health decision-making.

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus using a predefined search string to identify studies on climate change and health published between January 1, 2003, and March 1, 2024, with no geographic restrictions. Retrieved articles were screened and data extracted using Covidence software. Thematic analysis was performed in ATLAS.TI employing Braun and Clark’s six-step method. The identified knowledge translation approaches were categorized according to the Cochrane Knowledge Translation Framework.

Our findings highlight five primary knowledge translation approaches: (1) monitoring the coverage of climate change and health across media, scientific literature, and government responses; (2) engaging citizens of all ages in participatory activities to address local climate challenges and co-develop policy solutions; (3) integrating knowledge generation, synthesis, and dissemination for effective communication; (4) emphasizing advocacy and education to foster collaborations and gain support from decision-makers; and (5) leveraging health impact assessment tools to guide decision-making related to climate change and health. Nonetheless, we did not find any primary studies on climate change research and knowledge translation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).

There is a need for primary studies on the knowledge translation of climate change research, especially in relation to adaptation, into meaningful public health actions that can inform decision-making and contribute to building climate-resilient health systems in LMICs.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), drought (MESH:C536747), mental trauma (MESH:D008607), Infectious diseases (MESH:D003141)
- **Chemicals:** carbon (MESH:D002244)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Japanese encephalitis virus (no rank) [taxon 11072]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597920/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597920/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597920/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597920