# Impact of prior immunotherapy on paclitaxel/bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

**Authors:** Agathe Peyret, Clémentine Le Berrurier, Luc Heraudet, Tara Delon, Maéva Zysman, Mathieu Larroquette, Laura Leroy, Sophie Cousin, Charlotte Domblides

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1675386 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2025-10-27

## TL;DR

This study shows that using immunotherapy before paclitaxel/bevacizumab treatment improves outcomes for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that sequential immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy improves treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC.

## Key findings

- Patients who received immunotherapy before PB had significantly longer time to treatment discontinuation and progression-free survival.
- The overall response rate was higher in patients who received prior immunotherapy.
- There was a non-significant trend toward better overall survival in the immunotherapy-first group.

## Abstract

Immunotherapy is becoming essential in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the best treatment sequence remains to be determined. Some data suggest that immunotherapy prior to chemotherapy with paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB) appears to be an interesting option. Here, we study this sequence in a validation cohort from the Bordeaux Cancer Institute (France). We retrospectively included all patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2015 and 2021, treated with PB directly after immunotherapy (CAI) or without prior exposure to immunotherapy (CWPI). The primary outcome was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We included 121 patients: 60 in the CAI group and 61 in the CWPI group. Their characteristics were comparable, even for the main prognostic criteria. The median number of lines received was higher in the CAI group (4 vs. 2). There was a significant difference in TTD (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.34–0.72, p = 0.0002), PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.87, p < 0.005), and ORR (58% versus 38%, p < 0.05) between the two groups, as well as a non-statistically significant trend toward better OS (7.40 vs. 3.70 months, HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.52–1.10, p = 0.15). We found a significant difference in TTD, PFS, and ORR for PB after exposure to immunotherapy, with a trend toward better OS. This suggests that sequential treatment with immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy could be an interesting option after first-line treatment.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** paclitaxel (PubChem CID 36314)
- **Diseases:** NSCLC (MONDO:0005233)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Cancer (MESH:D009369), NSCLC (MESH:D002289)
- **Chemicals:** paclitaxel (MESH:D017239), PB (-), bevacizumab (MESH:D000068258)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597745/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597745/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597745/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12597745