How Long Do We Have? A Retrospective Review of Palliative Extubation in the Burn Unit
Hannah M Jones, Colette Galet, Alexander Kurjatko

TL;DR
This study examines factors predicting death within 1 hour after palliative extubation in burn patients to help guide care discussions and improve palliative care.
Contribution
The study identifies clinical factors associated with rapid death after palliative extubation specifically in adult burn patients.
Findings
Higher SOFA scores and anion gaps were significantly associated with death within 1 hour of palliative extubation.
About 53% of patients who underwent palliative extubation died within 1 hour.
Factors like vasoactive medications and acidosis were linked to shorter survival times.
Abstract
Palliative extubation is the termination of mechanical ventilation to allow for a natural death when a patient’s goals no longer align with maintenance of ventilator support. Anticipating a patient’s survival time after palliative extubation is important when counseling patient families and can facilitate individualized palliative care and organ donation processes. This has not been explored in burns. Herein, we aimed at identifying factors associated with death within 1 h of palliative extubation within our adult burn unit population. This is a retrospective case–control study. Adult patients who underwent palliative extubation from July 10, 2015 to June 30, 2023 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, and clinical parameters were collected. Variables with a P-value ≤.1 in univariate analysis as well as age, sex, and TBSA burned (%) were included in the multivariate…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Demographics | Age | |
| Sex | ||
| Race | ||
| Body Mass Index | BMI | |
| Comorbidities | Smoker status | |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | COPD | |
| Chronic heart failure | CHF | |
| Diabetes Mellitus | DM | |
| Myocardial infarction | MI | |
| cerebrovascular disease | CVD | |
| peripheral vascular disease | PVD | |
| Dementia | ||
| Burn injury information | Mechanism of injury | MOI |
| Presence of inhalation injury | ||
| Total burn surface area | TBSA | |
| Second degree burn surface area | ||
| Third degree burn surface area | ||
| Burn injury body location | ||
| Circumferential burn | ||
| Hospital course | Hospital length of stay | LOS |
| Ventilator days | ||
| Prehospital intubation | ||
| First 24-h fluid totals | ||
| Escharotomy | ||
| Canthotomy | ||
| Surgery performed | ||
| Tracheostomy | ||
| Amputation | ||
| Pressor use | ||
| Paralytic use | ||
| Continuous renal replacement therapy | CRRT | |
| Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | ECMO | |
| Blood transfusion | ||
| Palliative care consulted | ||
| Date of palliative care consult | ||
| Patient vitals | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment | SOFA |
| Temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Respiratory rate | ||
| Mean arterial pressure | ||
| Respiratory parameters | Oxygen saturation | SPO2 |
| Partial pressure of oxygen | paO2 | |
| Partial pressure of carbon dioxide | paCO2 | |
| Positive end-expiratory pressure | PEEP | |
| Fraction of inspired oxygen | FiO2 | |
| Tidal volume | ||
| Minute ventilation | ||
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio | ||
| SPO2/FiO2 ratio | ||
| Laboratory variables | pH | |
| Anion gap | ||
| Phosphorus | ||
| Lactate |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Demographics | |||
| Male, | 16 (72.7) | 18 (72) | >.999 |
| Age, median [IQR] | 71 [65-77.5] | 66 [55-78] | .326 |
| BMI, median [IQR] | 31.1 [25.5-38.2] | 26.6 [21.4-36.5] | .227 |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Smoker, | 11 (50) | 10 (40) | .564 |
| COPD, | 9 (40.9) | 8 (32) | .558 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 8 (36.4) | 5 (20) | .328 |
| Myocardial Infarction, | 9 (40.9) | 9 (36) | .771 |
| Peripheral vascular disease, | 2 (9.1) | 0 | .214 |
| Chronic heart failure, | 4 (18.2) | 4 (16) | >.999 |
| Cerebrovascular disease, | 3 (13.6) | 0 | .095 |
| Dementia, | 0 | 0 | |
| Injury information | |||
| % TBSA, median [IQR] | 31.5 [17.8-38.2] | 46 [17-63.6] | .364 |
| % Second degree burn, median [IQR] | 13 [5-25] | 7 [2-19] | .535 |
| % Third degree burn, median [IQR] | 11.8 [0.8-34] | 34.5 [3-51] | .438 |
| Inhalation injury, | 15 (68.2) | 13 (52) | .373 |
| Modified Baux score, median [IQR] | 112.8 [95-138.5] | 124 [105.6-141.8] | .364 |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| On vasopressors, | 10 (45.5) | 16 (64) | .248 |
| Number of vasopressors, median [IQR] | 0 [0-1] | 1 [0-3] |
|
| On paralytic, | 1 (4.5) | 4 (16) | .352 |
| Required CRRT during hospitalization, | 3 (13.6) | 8 (32) | .179 |
| Required ECMO during hospitalization, | 0 | 2 (8) | .491 |
| Required CPR during hospitalization, | 7 (31.8) | 9 (36) | >.999 |
| SOFA score, median [IQR] | 7.5 [5-8] | 9 [7.5-11] |
|
| Temperature, median [IQR] | 37.2 [36.7-37.9] | 36.5 [36.03-38.03] | .857 |
| Heart rate, median [IQR] | 93[78.5-119] | 98 [67-120] | .768 |
| Respiratory rate, median [IQR] | 20.5 [16-25] | 21 [16-28] | .889 |
| SPO2, median [IQR] | 96 [88-99.3] | 97 [90.5-98.5] | .654 |
| Mean arterial pressure, median [IQR] | 67.5 [59.5-76.8] | 56 [36.5-68.3] |
|
| HR/RR, median [IQR] | 4.9 [3.4-6.3] | 4.5[2.97-6.46] | .889 |
| pH, median [IQR] | 7.37 [7.32-7.43] | 7.23 [7.12-7.32] |
|
| paO2, median [IQR] | 94 [75-154] | 113 [84.8-210.3] | .632 |
| paCO2, median [IQR] | 41 [33-48] | 45.5 [38.3-60.75] | .241 |
| Anion gap | 10 [7-13] | 16 [9.8-20.3] |
|
| Glucose | 166 [145-193] | 156 [163.5-209.8] | .461 |
| Phosphorus | 3.1 [2.8-4] | 4.5 [3-6.9] | .094 |
| Bilirubin | 0.75 [0.43-1.18] | 0.75 [0.40-1.27] | >.999 |
| Lactate | 2 [1.6-3.5] | 4 [2-8.4] |
|
| PEEP, median [IQR] | 8 [8-10] | 10 [8-12] | .526 |
| FiO2, median [IQR] | 0.4 [0.3-0.61] | 0.56 [0.4-0.9] | .292 |
| Tidal volume, median [IQR] | 510 [415.5-597] | 424 [339-485] | .110 |
| Minute ventilation, median [IQR] | 10.5 [8-13] | 8.5 [6.95-12] | .668 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio, median [IQR] | 250 [203-400] | 183 [127-437] | .453 |
| SpO2/FiO2 ratio, median [IQR] | 228.8 [150.8-298.3] | 172.5 [110.9-231.7] | .284 |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ventilator days, median [IQR] | 3 [1-6.3] | 2 [1-7.5] | .935 |
| Hospital length of stay (days), median [IQR] | 3 [1.8-7.5] | 3 [1-11.5] | .935 |
| Complications | |||
| Ventilator-associated pneumonia, | 1 (4.5) | 2 (8) | >.999 |
| Sepsis, | 2 (9) | 3 (12) | >.999 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units · Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
INTRODUCTION
Burns are life-threatening injuries that may result in death from burn shock, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, organ failure, anoxic brain injury, or other morbid conditions.1–4 When these conditions become overwhelming, patients, families, and practitioners in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be faced with the challenging choice of terminating life-sustaining measures.5 Palliative extubation is the termination of mechanical ventilation to allow for a natural death when a patient’s goals no longer align with maintenance of ventilator support.6 This process is complex, necessitating effective goals of care conversations and the coordination of interdisciplinary teams and patient families.7
The negative psychological impact of the death of a family member in the ICU has been studied by psychologists and intensivists.8 Studies have correlated the death of a loved one in the ICU and the degree of involvement in decision-making during the process with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder of family members.9 Additionally, family members who reported poor communication with ICU providers have been shown to have an increased incidence of complex grief following the death of a family member in the ICU.8 Effective communication from ICU providers and accurate prognostications has been shown to enable families to make informed decisions, cope with uncertainty, and ease distress.10 Evidence-based measures for estimating time to death (TTD) after palliative extubation can improve prognostication and equip providers with guidance during goals of care conversations. While scoring systems such as the revised Baux (rBaux) score have demonstrated value in predicting overall mortality among those suffering burns, there is no model that currently exists to anticipate how long a patient will live following palliative extubation.11
Predicting the TTD following palliative extubation also has importance among patients who are eligible for organ donation. Organ donation after circulatory death is a growing source for transplantation.12 One of the most important components of donation after circulatory death is the reduction of ischemia time after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures.13 Several studies have therefore attempted to model risk factors that predict TTD within 1 h of palliative extubation for the purpose of optimizing organ donation.13–15 This retrospective study was designed to identify predictors for TTD after palliative extubation in burn patients.
METHODS
Ethical statement
Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study (IRB # 201712728). A waiver of consent was approved for all subjects.
Institutional practice
The burn faculty has a discussion with patients and their families focused on patterns of injury, projected treatment plans, and anticipated complications upon admission to the burn unit. Further formal discussions are held with patients and their families weekly for those who are critically ill, have a burn size greater than 20% TBSA, or develop significant clinical changes. Palliative care services and the regional organ donor network are consulted at the discretion of the burn surgery faculty based on projected clinical outcomes. When palliative care participates in patient care, its service meets with patients and their families daily to ensure their needs are being met. Palliative care may be present during the palliative extubation of a patient to provide support, depending on their availability. If a patient lives beyond an hour following palliative extubation, they may be relocated to a palliative care ward where comfort goals for end-of-life can be tailored to. For patients whose surrogate decision-makers elect for organ donation following terminal extubation, successful organ procurement requires death within 1 h after extubation. As such, we selected a TTD of 60 min as the primary endpoint of the study.
Study design
Our institution’s burn registry was queried retrospectively to identify all burn patients aged 18 and older admitted from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2023 who had been intubated for any period of time beyond the operating room. Ventilated patients who were extubated as part of end-of-life care were included in our study. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines for cohort studies.16^,^17
Data collection
Demographics, comorbidities, burn injury information, hospital course, vitals, respiratory parameters, and laboratory variables collected are presented in Table 1. Vital signs and laboratory values measured were at the time closest to the palliative extubation. Need for ECMO, CRRT, and CPR was collected if the patient needed any of these during hospitalization. The rBaux score was calculated based on the clinical information collected.
Statistical analysis
Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for all continuous variables. All non-normally distributed continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables, while Mann–Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables. Variables with a P-value ≤.1 in univariate analysis as well as age, sex, and TBSA (%) were included in multivariate models. Binary logistic regression was conducted using the forward Wald approach. Goodness of fit was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. All analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0 (IBM), and P < .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
A total of 360 patients were intubated for any period of time outside of the operating room during the study period. Forty-seven patients (13.1%) transitioned to comfort care involving palliative extubation; 25 (53.2%) died within 1 h postpalliative extubation (median time: 16 [9.5-23.5] min. Twenty-two patients (46.8%) died more than 1 h postpalliative extubation. Only 5 patients (10.6%) lived longer than 24 h (median time: 2 [1.5-7] days). Most patients died in the burn unit or surgical ICU, although 4 patients were transferred to the palliative service (median TTD: 2885 min), and one was discharged to a hospice facility (TTD: 5 days).
As shown in Table 2, there were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or burn injury between patients who died within 1 h vs those who died over an hour after palliative extubation.
Clinical and laboratory test information
Table 3 summarizes clinical and laboratory information. Patients who died within 1 h postpalliative extubation were prescribed more vasopressor medications than those who died after 1 h, though there was no difference in the proportion of patients on vasopressors between the groups. Their SOFA scores were significantly higher (9 [7.5-11] vs 7.5 [5-8]; P = .009) while their mean arterial pressure (56 [36.5-68.3] vs 67.5 [59.5-76.8]; P = .039) and pH (7.23 [7.12-7.32] vs 7.37 [7.32-7.43]; P = .001) were significantly lower than those of the patients who died more than 1 h postpalliative extubation. Their blood level of anion gap (16 [9.8-20.3] vs 10 [7.0-13.0]; P = .022) and lactate (4 [2-8.4] vs 2 [1.6-3.5]; P = .024) were also significantly higher than that of patients who died more than 1-h postpalliative extubation. No other differences were observed.
Outcomes
As shown in Table 4, there were no significant differences in the number of days on a ventilator, hospital length of stay, or complications between patients who died within 1 h vs those who died over an hour after palliative extubation.
Variables associated with death within 1 h postpalliative extubation
In multivariate analysis, adjusting for variables with a P-value ≤0.1 in univariate analysis as well as age, sex, and TBSA (%), increased SOFA score (OR = 2.85 [1.17-6.93], P = .021) and anion gap (OR = 1.69 [1.01-2.81], P 0.044) were associated with higher odds of dying within 1 h postpalliative extubation.
DISCUSSION
While many studies have found that the median TTD fell under 1 h after palliative extubation, some have found patients surviving for several hours.15^,^18–27 In our study, the median TTD after extubation was 26 min. We evaluated several variables, including vital signs, laboratory value, and illness severity scales, to determine potential associations with early death. Our results show that increased SOFA scores and anion gap are associated with death within 1 h after palliative extubation.
Vital signs are a common metric to trend a patient’s clinical well-being. Hypoxia measured through pulse oximetry has been used as a variable in machine learning models with success.24^,^28^,^29 A retrospective analysis of elderly ICU patients demonstrated that a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg was associated with earlier TTD following withdrawal from support.23 Huynh et al. found that FiO_2_ > 70% and the requirement of vasopressors are individually associated with earlier TTD, with these variables serving as markers of a patient’s respiratory and hemodynamic instability.20 Wind et al. found that the use of controlled mechanical ventilation was the only variable associated with earlier TTD in their cohort, and Long et al identified higher PEEP as a predictor for earlier TTD.15^,^21 In our study, no vital signs or any ventilator parameters were associated with a patient’s TTD following extubation. While relatively lower mean arterial pressure and a higher number of vasopressors were significantly associated with death within 1 h of palliative extubation on univariate analysis, no association was found on multivariate analysis.
Laboratory values are useful in alerting physicians to a patient’s clinical decline. Prior studies have associated earlier TTD after palliative extubation through findings of low pH and low serum bicarbonate.24^,^30 While our study found a relationship between acidosis and death within 1 h of extubation on univariate analysis, there was no relationship seen on multivariate analysis. Instead, we found that a relatively higher anion gap was associated with death within 1 h of palliative extubation. Several studies involving diverse patient populations implicate anion gap as a predictive risk factor for mortality.31–39 To our knowledge, this study is the first to find a relationship between anion gap and TTD following cessation of life support.
Many scoring systems exist to guide physicians on the severity of illness that patients present with. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score is an illness severity score used to evaluate organ dysfunction.40 Higher APACHE II scores have been shown to be correlated with death within 60 min of palliative extubation.27 One study found that extremes in another illness severity score, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were associated with TTD within 24 h of extubation.23 Specific to burn surgery, the rBaux score is a useful guide to utilize in palliative care discussions with patients and families. However, the rBaux score may not capture the complexities of a patient’s condition and has not been previously studied in the context of TTD following palliative extubation.41 Our institution utilizes the SOFA score to track illness severity in burn-injured and traumatically injured patients. The SOFA score was developed to objectively describe organ dysfunction.42 Many prior studies have correlated organ dysfunction with mortality in both burn and general ICU populations.41^,^43–45 Our study identifies that the SOFA score has an association with death within 1 h of palliative extubation. Interestingly, the rBaux score and its components (age, TBSA, and presence of inhalation injury) were not found to have a significant association with TTD.
Long et al. noted that the presence of diabetes is correlated with a shorter TTD, which they hypothesize could be attributed to cardiac autonomic neuropathy facilitating quicker hemodynamic collapse.21 However, another study suggests that acute injury seems to play a larger role than chronic medical conditions in earlier death following extubation.44 Indeed, we found that medical comorbidities, including smoking status, COPD, CHF, DM, MI, cerebrovascular disease, PVD, and dementia, were not found to be associated with TTD after palliative extubation. However, acute interventions such as ECMO, CRRT, and CPR were also not associated with TTD after palliative extubation. While acute interventions and comorbidities should remain a point of discussion when counseling families and patients on the overall survivability of a burn injury, they do not appear to have a significant effect on TTD after palliative extubation.
This study comes with limitations. Due to the nature of a retrospective design, one limitation of our study was the inability to standardize the time of collection of laboratory and clinical values. A patient’s or family’s decision to proceed to comfort care may not be entirely random, and therefore, selection bias may exist within the cohort. While the variables used in the analysis were the most recent value collected before extubation, standardization of time between collection and extubation could impact the results. Being placed on ECMO or CRRT was recorded, but we did not account for the length of time spent with either treatment strategy. Similarly, undergoing CPR was recorded but the duration of resuscitation and the dosages of medications were not accounted for in our study. While the number of vasopressors was collected in our study, the duration and dosages of the vasopressors were not. Certain medications that may have impacted outcomes, such as opiate or sedative medications, were not accounted for in our study. The mean length of stay in our population was 3 days, which represents the early stages of a burn patient’s hospitalization. These findings therefore may not generalize to patients who undergo palliative extubation further into their hospital course. Our multivariable analysis included 11 variables, which is high. However, we used the forward Wald approach, which is a systematic approach to identify the most important predictors for a binary outcome. This leads to more accurate predictions and a better understanding of the relationships between variables. Finally, our sample size was relatively small, and this study is not intended to be generalized to all burn patients. Despite these limitations, this study develops a foundation for further research into predictive measures of TTD after palliative extubation of burn patients.
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective cohort study to examine predictors for TTD after palliative extubation in the burn ICU. Higher SOFA score and elevated anion gap at the time of extubation were associated with post-extubation TTD. The rBaux score, which is a common predictor for mortality in burn patients, was not significantly associated with TTD after extubation. More research should be done to further characterize these predictive measures in burn patients.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Bittner E, Sheridan R. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, and inhalation injury in burn patients. Surg Clin North Am 2023;103:439–451.37149380 10.1016/j.suc.2023.01.006PMC 10028407 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Kallinen O, Maisniemi K, Bohling T et al. Multiple organ failure as a cause of death in patients with severe burns. J Burn Care Res 2012;33:206–211.10.1097/BCR.0b 013e 3182331 e 7321979843 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Williams FN, Herndon DN, Hawkins HK et al. The leading causes of death after burn injury in a single pediatric burn center. Crit Care 2009;13:R 183.10.1186/cc 8170 PMC 281194719919684 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Zavlin D, Chegireddy V, Boukovalas S et al. Multi-institutional analysis of independent predictors for burn mortality in the United States. Burns Trauma 2018;6:24.30151396 10.1186/s 41038-018-0127-y PMC 6103989 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Leung DYP, Chan HYL. Palliative and end-of-life care: more work is required. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:7429.10.3390/ijerph 17207429 PMC 759978833065964 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Ortega-Chen C, Van Buren N, Kwack J et al. Palliative extubation: a discussion of practices and considerations. J Pain Symptom Manag 2023;66:e 219–e 231.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.01137023832 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Velez DR, Irons TD, Opimo AB et al. SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2025;10:e 001663.39845996 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001663 PMC 11749792 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Kentish-Barnes N, Chaize M, Seegers V et al. Complicated grief after death of a relative in the intensive care unit. Eur Respir J 2015;45:1341–1352.10.1183/09031936.0016001425614168 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
