New Evidence of TLR4 and TLR9 Variants Influencing Parasitaemia and Symptoms of Plasmodium vivax Infection
Mikaele Monik Rodrigues Inácio Silva, Gabriela Maria Andrade Correia, Juliana Dal‐Ri Lindenau, Maristela Gomes Cunha, Maria Deise Oliveira Ohnishi, Ana Maria Revoredo Silva Ventura, Ândrea Ribeiro‐dos‐Santos, Mara Helena Hutz, Vinicius Albuquerque Sortica

TL;DR
This study finds that genetic variants in TLR4 and TLR9 are linked to higher parasite levels and more severe symptoms in P. vivax malaria in the Brazilian Amazon.
Contribution
First evidence of TLR4 rs1927911 variant's association with P. vivax symptoms in the Brazilian Amazonian population.
Findings
TLR9 rs352140TT homozygotes had higher parasitaemia levels than C allele carriers.
TLR4 rs1927911GG homozygotes had a higher clinical index than A allele carriers.
Abstract
Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) induce the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and regulate the immune response to Plasmodium vivax infection. Genetic variants of TLRs are associated with susceptibility and severity of malaria in different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the association between polymorphisms in TLR1, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and TIRAP and the clinical manifestations of malaria caused by P. vivax in a population from the Amazon region of Pará, Brazil. A total of 148 individuals with symptomatic uncomplicated malaria were genotyped for rs4833095, rs1927911, rs179008, rs3764880, rs352140 and rs8177374 variants, and their associations with parasitaemia levels, gametocytaemia and clinical index were analysed using generalised linear models. TLR9 rs352140TT homozygotes had higher parasitaemia levels than C allele carriers (p = 0.034). TLR4 rs1927911GG homozygotes had…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Gene | db SNP id | Position (GRCh38) | Alleles | Assay | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| rs4833095 | chr04:38798089 | C > T | C__44103606_10 | missense |
|
| rs1927911 | chr09:117707776 | A > G | C__11722141_10 | intron |
|
| rs179008 | chrX:12885540 | A > T | C___2259574_10 | missense |
|
| rs3764880 | chrX:12906707 | A > G | C___2183830_10 | 5 Prime UTR |
|
| rs352140 | chr03:52222681 | C > T | C___2301954_20 | synonym |
|
| rs8177374 | chr11:126292948 | C > T | C__25983622_10 | missense |
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
|
| 148 (100) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 50 (33.8) |
| Male | 98 (66.2) |
| Age | 32 (12:88) |
| Genetic ancestry | |
| Amerindian | 0.320 (0.109:0.695) |
| European | 0.411 (0.199:0.708) |
| African | 0.220 (0.094:0.516) |
| Parasitaemia | 5.500 (50:75.000) |
| Gametocytaemia | 100 (15:4.500) |
| Days in the infection site | |
| 1–25 | 79 (53.4) |
| 26 or more | 30 (20.3) |
| residents | 33 (22.3) |
| missing | 6 (4.1) |
| Infection history | |
| first infection | 100 (67.6) |
| second infection | 17 (11.5) |
| third infection | 30 (20.3) |
| missing | 1 (0.7) |
| Variant | Alleles | Genotypes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| C | T | CC | CT | TT |
| 147 (0.50) | 147 (0.50) | 38 (25.9) | 71 (48.3) | 38 (25.9) | |
|
| A | G | AA | AG | GG |
| 127 (0.43) | 169 (0.57) | 32 (21.6) | 64 (43.2) | 52 (35.1) | |
|
| C | T | CC | CT | TT |
| 154 (0.52) | 142 (0.48) | 45 (30.8) | 62 (42.5) | 39 (26.7) | |
|
| C | T | CC | CT | TT |
| 263 (0.89) | 33 (0.11) | 118 (80.3) | 26 (17.7) | 3 (2.0) | |
| Gene | Alleles | Genotypes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | ||||||
|
| A | T | AA | AT | TT | A | T |
| 238 (0.81) | 56 (0.19) | 36 (72.0) | 13 (26.0) | 1 (2.0) | 76 (78.4) | 21 (21.6) | |
|
| A | G | AA | AG | GG | A | G |
| 161 (0.55) | 131 (0.45) | 19 (38.8) | 21 (42.9) | 9 (18.4) | 51 (52.6) | 46 (47.4) | |
| Variants | Genotypes |
| Mean parasitaemia |
| Cohen's | Clinical index |
| Cohen's |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CT + TT | 104 | 4634.47 (3140.51:6823.39) | 0.307 | −0.034 (−0.279:0.211) | 0.404 | ||
| CC | 35 | 6266.14 (3564.51:11,015.39) | −0.190 (−0548:0.168) | |||||
|
| AA+AG | 90 | 4709.77 (3118.89:7095.78) | 0.546 | −0.211 (−0.462:0.039) |
| 0.34 | |
| GG | 49 | 5533.50 (3388.44:9057.33) | 0.184 (−0.124:0.492) | |||||
|
| AT + TT | 34 | 6982.32 (3944.57:12,359.47) | 0.140 | −0.124 (−0.486:0.238) | 0.720 | ||
| AA | 105 | 4487.45 (3047.89:6591.74) | −0.056 (−0.301:0.189) | |||||
|
| AG + GG | 70 | 5260.17 (3419.79:8072.35) | 0.483 | −0.132 (−0.398:0.134) | 0.401 | ||
| AA | 68 | 4385.31 (2747.89:6998.42) | 0.004 (−286:0.293) | |||||
|
| CC + TC | 100 | 4207.27 (2851.02:6208.69) |
| 0.32 | −0.107 (−0.356:0.143) | 0.475 | |
| TT | 38 | 7762.47 (4528.98:13,304.54) | 0.026 (−0.324:0.375) | |||||
|
| CT + TT | 28 | 5296.63 (2904.02:9660.51) | 0.057 | −0.030 (−0.408:0.349) | 0.779 | ||
| CC | 111 | 4897.79 (3280.95:7311.39) | −0.087 (−0.337:0.162) |
| Variants | Genotypes |
| Mean gametocytaemia |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CT + TT | 47 | 178.39 (106.27:299.47) | 0.635 |
| CC | 22 | 154.78 (86.75:275.89) | ||
|
| AA + AG | 39 | 176.09 (104.17:297.67) | 0.725 |
| GG | 30 | 159.33 (91.74:277.00) | ||
|
| AT + TT | 17 | 164.51 (84.35:321.18) | 0.926 |
| AA | 52 | 169.52 (104.48:275.34) | ||
|
| AG + GG | 32 | 149.61 (90.92:245.92) | 0.982 |
| AA | 36 | 148.56 (85.03:259.82) | ||
|
| CC + TC | 46 | 198.54 (116.75:337.65) | 0.232 |
| TT | 22 | 136.18 (76.48:242.74) | ||
|
| CT | 17 | 162.23 (80.48:327.01) | 0.891 |
| CC | 52 | 170.72 (103.34:282.31) |
- —Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico10.13039/501100003593
- —Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior10.13039/501100002322
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMalaria Research and Control · Mosquito-borne diseases and control · Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Introduction
1
Malaria is a febrile infectious disease caused by a protozoan of the genus Plasmodium that is transmitted to humans by the bite of female Anopheles mosquitoes (Aguiar et al. 2022). It is considered a serious public health problem worldwide, with more than 260 million cases reported in endemic countries in America, Africa, Asia and Oceania (WHO 2023). In Brazil, the prevalence of malaria is endemic in the Amazon region, comprising 99% of cases, of which the species P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. vivax are the main causes (Brasil 2024). In 2022, of all autochthonous cases, 84.2% (108,594) were caused by P. vivax, 13.9% (17,981) by P. falciparum, and 1.8% (2344) by mixed malaria infections (more than one parasite species at the same time). A total of 38 cases (< 0.1%) of malaria by P. malariae were recorded that year (SUS 2023; Brasil 2024). However, studies using real‐time PCR as a diagnostic tool demonstrated that P. malariae prevalence is underestimated in the malaria‐endemic Amazon region (Cunha et al. 2021). In Brazilian areas outside this region, most of the cases were imported from Amazonian states. However, some of the malaria cases were imported from other countries as Angola, South Africa, Mozambique, French Guiana, Guyana, Nigeria, Venezuela and Equatorial Guinea (Brasil 2022; Garcia et al. 2022).
Malaria is a complex disease affected by environmental and genetic factors, amongst which, the degree of immunity and genetic background are crucial for understanding the different impacts of diversity in response, progression and severity caused by clinical and physiological manifestations (Ramírez et al. 2023). In this context, studies have revealed the relationship between toll‐like receptor (TLR) variants involved in the immune response to malaria, which can influence clinical characteristics during pathogenesis (TLR1, TLR4 and TLR9) and severity (TLR2 and TLR6) (Mukherjee et al. 2019; Penha‐Gonçalves 2019; Antonelli et al. 2020; Dobbs et al. 2020). TLRs are a family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are important in the detection of pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and those associated with cell damage (DAMPs). They play a key role in inducing the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, thereby activating transcription factor Nuclear Kappa B (NF‐κB) and bridging the gap between innate and adaptive immunity (Costa et al. 2017; Costa et al. 2018; Naing et al. 2021; Penha‐Gonçalves 2019; Ramirez Ramirez et al. 2022; Ramírez et al. 2023).
Genetic variants can significantly impact the expression and binding capacity of TLRs, altering their function and regulating their response to different pathogens. Single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs) of TLRs and Toll‐interleukin‐1 receptor domain‐containing adaptor protein (TIRAP) have been associated with malaria susceptibility and severity (Costa et al. 2017).
In addition to individual genetic variants, population structure and genomic ancestry significantly influence the interpretation of genetic associations. Previous studies indicate that genomic ancestry across different regions of Brazil is more uniform than expected (Cassiano et al. 2015; Pena et al. 2011); however, the extensive admixture amongst Europeans, Africans and Amerindians still necessitates careful control in association studies to prevent spurious results and accurately evaluate the impact of TLR polymorphisms (Cassiano et al. 2015).
Given the delicate interconnections between these components, it is essential to understand their pathophysiology, which can aid in the development of new strategies to reduce the morbidity of this disease. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the potential influence of variants of TLR1, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and TIRAP on the clinical manifestations of malaria caused by P. vivax in the Amazon region of Brazil.
Materials and Methods
2
Subjects and Ethical Statement
2.1
We included 148 samples from individuals infected with P. vivax in the Amazon region of Pará in the study, as previously described (Sortica et al. 2012). Pará is a Brazilian state in the northern region of the country that borders the Brazilian states of Amapá, Amazonas, Maranhão, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, and Roraima, as well as the South American countries of Guyana and Suriname. All individuals were born in Pará, Brazil, and were diagnosed with uncomplicated symptomatic malaria. The diagnosis was made using thick blood film, and the levels of parasitaemia and gametocytaemia density per microlitre of blood were estimated by counting the number of parasites per 100 fields and double‐checked blindly by two expert microscopists. The clinical assessment was performed by doctors and recorded numerically as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), and 4 (very severe). The most common symptoms were fever, chills, headache, arthralgia, lower back pain, asthenia, myalgia, dizziness, tinnitus, deafness, insomnia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, eructation, flatulence, diarrhoea, choluria, oliguria, anuria, pallor, jaundice, pruritus, allergy, cough, dyspnoea, anorexia, splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. Blood samples from individuals diagnosed with malaria were taken just before the start of treatment. All patients received 1,500 mg of chloroquine combined with 210 mg of primaquine for 7 days, as recommended by the Ministry of Health (Brasil 2009). This project was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Evandro Chagas Institute (CEP/IEC‐0035) and Federal University of Pará (061/07 CEP‐CCS/UFPA). All the individuals included in the study signed an informed consent form. Participants younger than 18 years provided informed consent signed by parents to participate in the study.
Molecular Analysis
2.2
The samples were genotyped using Real‐Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT‐PCR) for the genetic variations of rs4833095, rs1927911, rs179008, rs3764880, rs352140, and rs8177374 of the TLR1, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9, and TIRAP genes, respectively (Table 1). Applied Biosystems TaqMan SNP assays were used for this purpose. To establish genomic ancestry control, 48 molecular markers were used in the statistical analyses (Sortica et al. 2012).
Statistical Analysis
2.3
Allelic and genotypic frequencies were estimated by direct counting, and deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were investigated using the chi‐square test. Principal component analysis was used to group symptoms into a clinical severity index. The TLR genotypes were associated with the levels of parasitaemia, gametocytaemia and clinical index using general linear models (GLMs). Parasitaemia and gametocyte levels were transformed to a logarithmic scale because they deviated from a normal distribution. However, the values transformed back into a standard scale were presented in the results as geometric means. In the GLMs, covariates of sex, age, African and European genetic ancestry, period of exposure and disease history were included because they are associated with malaria or correlated with levels of parasitaemia or gametocytaemia.
The statistical package SPSS 21.0 for Windows was used for statistical analysis. Significance was defined as a two‐tailed p value < 0.05, with Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d, based on standardised differences between means (Fritz et al. 2011).
Results
3
Clinical Profile and Ancestry Indices
3.1
The individuals ranged in age from 12 to 88 years, with a median age of 32 years, and males accounted for 66.2% of the participants. The genetic ancestry of the group studied comprised an average proportion of 22.8% African, 41.0% European and 32.4% Native American ancestry (Table 2). The period of exposure of patients in the regions of infection was variable, with 53.4% of the population remaining in the area for between 1 and 25 days, 20.3% remaining in the area for more than 25 days, and 22.3% being residents of the endemic place of infection (Table 2). It was observed that 67.6% of the individuals were infected with P. vivax for the first time, 11.5% had malaria for the second time, and 20.3% had malaria more than twice. The individuals had infections with parasitaemia levels ranging from 50 to 75,000 parasites/µL at the time of diagnosis, and a median of 5500 parasites/µL. Sexual forms of P. vivax were observed in only 70 individuals at diagnosis, with a range of 15–4500 gametocytes/µL and a median of 100 (Table 2).
Allelic Frequency and Association of TLR Variants With Parasitaemia and Gametocytaemia
3.2
All polymorphisms were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No statistical difference was observed in the allele frequencies of these polymorphisms between sexes. Tables 3 and 4 show the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the TLR variants.
An analysis using GLM was performed to test the association between genetic variants and parasitaemia levels in patients. The models were adjusted for sex, age, African and European genetic ancestry, exposure periods and disease history. Homozygotes for the T allele of the rs352140 polymorphism of TLR9 showed higher parasitaemia than carriers of the C allele (p = 0.034) (Table 5). This analysis presented a power of 57% and a medium effect size (d = 0.32), considering Cohen's classification (Fritz et al. 2011). No other variants were significantly associated with parasitaemia levels in this analysis. The association between the patients' gametocytaemia levels and the genetic variants of TLRs and TIRAP was tested using a GLM controlled by the same parameters. There was no association between the variants and gametocyte levels in individuals with P. vivax malaria (Table 6).
Association of TLR Variants With Clinical Severity Index
3.3
Principal component analysis was performed to group the symptoms presented by patients at the time of diagnosis. Symptoms were evaluated using numerical scores ranging from zero to four (absent, mild, moderate, severe and very severe). In the principal component analysis, the first component explained 39.3% of the variability in patients' symptoms. The first component identified the highest weights for the symptoms of fever, headache, chills, myalgia, arthralgia, lower back pain, abdominal pain, asthenia, dizziness, nausea and anorexia.
The first component was used as a clinical index in the GLM to investigate the association between genotypes and the severity of uncomplicated symptomatic malaria caused by P. vivax. Age, sex, exposure period, disease history, European and African genetic ancestry and parasitaemia were used as covariates in the analysis (Table 5).
Patients with homozygous TLR4 rs1927911GG had a higher clinical index than those carrying the A allele (p = 0.018). This analysis presented a medium effect size (d = 0.34), considering Cohen's classification (Fritz et al. 2011), and a power of 66%. Polymorphisms in the TLR1, TLR9, TLR7, TLR8 and TIRAP genes were not associated with the clinical index (Table 5).
Discussion
4
The immune response to malaria has different aspects, which can be partially explained by molecular pathways in which variations in the genetic background can modulate the immune response of patients affected by this disease. Thus, the combination of these variants can result in compromised or effective immune responses during infection (Mukherjee et al. 2019; Penha‐Gonçalves 2019; Antonelli et al. 2020; Dobbs et al. 2020).
TLR9 has two exons and is located in the 3p21.3 region of the short arm of chromosome 3. TLR9 interacts only with intracellular ligands because of its location in endosomes (Krishnegowda et al. 2005). Polymorphisms in the promoter region of this gene are associated with alterations in the expression of this protein, which have different consequences for the modulation of cytokines and immune responses. In our study, TLR9 rs352140 TT homozygotes were associated with higher levels of parasitaemia in P. vivax infection. These findings are consistent with those of Omar et al. (2012), who associated this variant with an increased risk of symptomatic malaria and higher levels of parasitaemia in P. falciparum in a Ghanaian population. Another study conducted in Colombia showed that TLR9 rs352140 CC homozygotes are protected against malaria infections (Mario‐Vásquez et al. 2021). This result is consistent with the finding that TT homozygotes are more susceptible to malaria and have higher levels of parasitaemia.
TLR4 is located in the 9q32‐q33 extended arm region of chromosome 9. This gene has four exons and is highly expressed in lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and splenocytes. TLR4 interacts with intra‐ and extracellular ligands because it is located on the surfaces of cells and endosomes. Variants in TLR4 have been described to alter its function and modulate the response to different infections (Dhangadamajhi et al. 2017; Rani et al. 2018). TLR4 rs4986790, rs4986791 and rs5030719 have been associated with modulation of the expression of the cytokine cascade in Plasmodium spp. malaria, with levels of parasitaemia and susceptibility in symptomatic cases of clinical P. vivax malaria (May et al. 2010; Rani et al. 2018; Sirisabhabhorn et al. 2021; Ramírez et al. 2023). Recently, children infected with P. falciparum from Nigeria, heterozygotes for the rs4986790 and rs4986791 variants, were associated with a higher susceptibility to complicated malaria (Bamikole et al. 2025). In our study, the TLR4 rs1927911 variant was associated with the clinical malaria index levels in an unprecedented manner. The rs1927911 variant is found in intron 1 of TLR4 and is associated with the risk of asthma, atherosclerosis and different types of cancer (Vawda et al. 2014; Xie et al. 2017; Moura et al. 2022). The effect of this polymorphism on TLR4 expression and function has yet to be determined. Functional studies may help to clarify the role of this variant in modulating the immune response to infectious diseases. The association of TLR9 rs352140 polymorphism with parasitaemia and the clinical presentation of malaria in the admixed population of Pará in this study corroborates the data found in the literature associating different variants of this gene with the severity and parasitaemia of Plasmodium spp. infections in populations of different ethnic origins (Omar et al. 2012; Mario‐Vásquez et al. 2021; Naing et al. 2021).
Furthermore, meta‐analyses (Dhangadamajhi et al. 2017; Naing et al. 2021; Ramirez Ramirez et al. 2022) and recent studies (Bamikole et al. 2025) show great variability in the genetic models included in statistical analyses, in the populations and in the age range of the individuals studied. These studies showed that TLR9 rs5743836 is associated with the risk of severe malaria in Indian adults with P. falciparum by stratified analysis (Dhangadamajhi et al. 2017) and associated with malaria (P. falciparum and P. vivax) severity in a heterozygous model and with a subgroup of adults from Asian countries under this model in a stratified analysis (Naing et al. 2021). TLR9 rs187084 was associated with severe P. falciparum malaria in allelic and homozygous models (Dhangadamajhi et al. 2017) and malaria severity in a heterozygous model and in a subgroup of children of non‐Asian countries under an allelic model in the stratified analysis (Naing et al. 2021). Another study showed that this variant was associated with the development of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in a heterozygous model (Bamikole et al. 2025). The meta‐analysis performed by Dhangadamajhi et al. (2017), based on Indian adult populations, and Naing et al. (2021), which included a subgroup of adults from several Asian countries, showed that TLR4 variants rs4986790 and rs4986791 have no statistically significant association with susceptibility and severity of malaria. However, a more recent meta‐analysis showed an association with parasitaemia for TLR1 in African populations*, TLR4* in Indian populations and TLR9 in cohorts from Africa, India and the Brazilian Amazon. In addition, TLR2 and TLR6 genes were associated with malaria severity in African populations, but not with susceptibility under different conditions (Ramirez Ramirez et al. 2022).
The above scenario describes the complexity of studies, such as the present study, with a structured admixed population. The gaps arising from the divergence of significant associations between genetic models and their effect on severity and susceptibility may reflect ancestral population backgrounds, in which ancestry carries significant weight in the genetic distribution of the population (Mario‐Vásquez 2020; Ramirez Ramirez et al. 2022).
In our study, no associations were found between the rs4833095, rs179008, rs3764880 and rs8177374 polymorphisms in the TLR1, TLR7, TLR8 and TIRAP genes and parasitaemia, gametocytaemia or the clinical malaria index. These data are consistent with those of Costa et al. (2017), who studied the genetic susceptibility of P. vivax in the Brazilian Amazon population. Due to the small sample size, we carried out genetic analyses using only the recessive model, which seems to be more robust than the additive model in GWAS‐type genetic study simulations, with better accuracy, precision and discrimination in identifying disease‐risk SNPs (Liu et al. 2021). The results of our study reinforce the importance of variants in the TLR4 and TLR9 genes in modulating the immune response to P. vivax malaria.
The complexity of host–parasite interactions in P. vivax malaria should also be interpreted in the context of the genetic diversity of the parasite itself. Current evidence indicates that P. vivax populations circulating in the Brazilian Amazon are not clonal and instead exhibit substantial genomic variability, which results in multiple distinct lineages across the region (Ibrahim et al. 2023). Moreover, population‐based genomic studies have identified Brazil‐specific mutations in genes related to mosquito transmission stages and antimalarial drug response, which may influence infection dynamics and clinical outcomes (Ibrahim et al. 2023). Similarly, mitochondrial genome analyses have documented extensive haplotype diversity and divergent evolutionary lineages in South America, including Brazil (Taylor et al. 2013). This parasite diversity, coupled with host genetic variability, may influence parasite virulence, immune evasion strategies and consequently the host immune response, potentially contributing to heterogeneity in clinical outcomes and in the associations observed with TLR polymorphisms. Considering both host and parasite genetic backgrounds is therefore essential for a comprehensive understanding of susceptibility to malaria and disease progression (Cornejo et al. 2015; Ibrahim et al. 2023).
However, our study has some limitations: (1) the small sample size made it impossible to carry out gene–gene interaction analyses; (2) due to the freezing of the blood samples before genotyping, it was not possible to measure other biological markers, such as cytokine levels, to corroborate the findings of the analyses with the genotypes; (3) the sample consisted only of cases of uncomplicated symptomatic malaria, and the results may not represent the same significance in asymptomatic individuals or those with complicated malaria. Despite these limitations, our findings indicate that variants of TLR4 and TLR9 may be molecular markers for the clinical presentation of malaria caused by P. vivax in the admixed population of the Brazilian Amazon. In contrast, a recent study conducted on the Brazil–French Guiana border, analysing 76 individuals, reported associations between TLR4, TLR6 and TLR9 polymorphisms and parasitological parameters, including gametocyte levels (Cerilo‐Filho et al. 2025). This difference likely reflects the smaller sample size and distinct population structure of the Cerilo‐Filho cohort, as well as regional variability in host genomic ancestry and parasite genetic diversity. Complementary studies with new samples and additional biological variables should be conducted to replicate these findings and help understand the variation in the presentation of symptomatic P. vivax infections.
Conclusions
5
The results of our study reinforce the importance of variants in the TLR4 and TLR9 genes in modulating the immune system's response to P. vivax malaria. Our results describe, for the first time, the association of the rs1927911 variant found in intron 1 of TLR4 with P. vivax malaria symptoms. These results highlight the importance of continuous studies of genetic variants in the susceptibility and severity of infectious and neglected diseases in the admixed population in Brazil. This will advance the knowledge of the pathophysiology of these diseases and help develop diagnostic and prevention strategies.
Ethics Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committees of the Evandro Chagas Institute (CEP/IEC‐0035/09 and CAAE 0038.0.072.000‐09) and Federal University of Pará (CEP‐CCS/UFPA 061/07).
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study or their legal guardian.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Aguiar, M. F. , B. M. Meireles , W. M. Monteiro , and J. F. Gonçalves . 2022. “Malaria in Indigenous and Non‐Indigenous Patients Aged Under 15 Years Between 2007–2018, Amazonas State, Brazil.” Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Medicina Tropical 55: e 0617.36287509 10.1590/0037-8682-0617-2021 PMC 9592102 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Antonelli, L. R. , C. Junqueira , J. M. Vinetz , D. T. Golenbock , M. U. Ferreira , and R. T. Gazzinelli . 2020. “The Immunology of Plasmodium vivax Malaria.” Immunological Reviews 293, no. 1: 163–189.31642531 10.1111/imr.12816 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bamikole, O. J. , S. A. Ademola , M. B. Olufeagba , B. A. Adedeji , and O. K. Amodu . 2025. “Association of Toll Like Receptors Polymorphism (TLR 1–rs 4833095, TLR 1–rs 5743611, TLR 6‐rs 5743810, TLR 6‐rs 5743809, TLR 4‐rs 4986790, TLR 4‐rs 4986791, TLR 9 rs 187084) With Clinical Outcome of Malaria Among Children in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.” Pathogens and Global Health 119: 1–12. 10.1080/20477724.2025.2478362.40114662 PMC 12086947 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Brasil . 2009. “Manual de diagnóstico laboratorial da malária.” Ministério da Saúde. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manualdiagnosticolaboratorialmalaria 2ed.pdf.
- 5Brasil . 2022. “Malária na Região Extra‐amazônica Do Brasil Série Histórica de 2010 a 2021.” Boletim Epidemiológico 53, no. 30: 13–32.
- 6Brasil . 2024. “Dia da Malária Nas Américas: um Panorama da Malária no Brasil em 2022 e no Primeiro Semestre de 2023 Dia da Malária Nas Américas: um Panorama da Malária no Brasil em 2022 e no Primeiro Semestre de 2023.” Boletim Epidemiológico 55, no. 1: 1–15.
- 7Cassiano, G. C. , E. J. M. Santos , M. H. T. Maia , et al. 2015. “Impact of Population Admixture on the Distribution of Immune Response Co‐Stimulatory Genes Polymorphisms in a Brazilian Population.” Human Immunology 76, no. 11: 836–842. 10.1016/j.humimm.2015.09.045.26429313 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Cerilo‐Filho, M. , A. D. R. Ramirez , V. S. Barbosa , et al. 2025. “Genetic Markers at the Crossroads: Toll‐Like Receptor Polymorphisms and Plasmodium vivax Malaria Parasitological Aspects From the Brazil–French Guiana Border.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene traf 061. 10.1093/trstmh/traf 061.40578841 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
