Evaluating the impact of delayed study startup on accrual in cancer studies
Isuru Ratnayake, Anh-Tuan Do, Daniel Gajewski, Sam Pepper, Oluwatobiloba Ige, Natalie Streeter, Tara L. Lin, Matthew McGuirk, Byron Gajewski, Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam

TL;DR
This study shows that delays in starting cancer clinical trials are linked to lower success in recruiting patients, especially in early-phase studies.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence linking delayed study startup to reduced accrual success in cancer trials.
Findings
Studies with shorter activation times (140.5 days) are more likely to meet 70% accrual goals.
Early-phase studies have significantly longer activation times than late-phase studies (p = 0.001).
Reducing activation time can improve accrual success across all trial phases.
Abstract
Drug development in cancer medicine relies on high-quality clinical trials, and the success of these trials depends on the design, optimization, and execution. Delays often arise from the study startup process, which can take 6 months or more. Complex challenges, including regulatory hurdles, contract negotiations, and inefficiencies in site activation, contribute to these delays. Streamlining these processes is critical to accelerating patients' access to potentially life-saving therapies. Data from the University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) were used to analyze studies initiated between 2018 and 2022. The accrual percentage was computed based on the number of enrolled participants and the desired accrual goal. Accrual success was determined by comparing the enrollment rate to predefined threshold values (50 %, 70 %, or 90 %). Studies that achieve or surpass the 70 % accrual…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
