# Strengthening Governance for Universalising Primary Oral Health Care: Perspectives from Karnataka, India

## TL;DR

This study examines the governance of oral health care in Karnataka, India, finding that weak policies and limited resources hinder progress toward equitable oral health services.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into governance challenges in public oral health systems and proposes reforms to strengthen oral health equity in India.

## Key findings

- Oral health in Karnataka lacks strategic vision, adequate funding, and integration into broader health programs.
- Weak governance is marked by outdated guidelines, workforce shortages, and limited community engagement.
- Reforms such as budget increases, leadership empowerment, and accountability systems are recommended to improve oral health equity.

## Abstract

Governance is central to health systems, and achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) relies on strong, sustainable systems. However, despite UHC's broad health goals, issues like oral health receive inadequate attention, signalling inequity in health systems. In India, oral diseases are rising, yet oral health remains a low political priority, reflecting weak governance and limited state commitment to health equity. This study analysed governance factors within Karnataka's public oral healthcare system through the lens of Siddiqi’s health governance assessment framework.

In this exploratory qualitative study, in-depth interviews with twenty stakeholders, including administrators and program implementers, explored enablers and constraints at policy and operational levels. Data analysis was guided by the governance framework developed by Siddiqi and colleagues.

The findings indicate that challenges persist while Karnataka’s oral health governance benefits from a separate directorate ensuring administrative functionality. These include a lack of strategic vision for oral health, inadequate policy formulation, limited social participation, insufficient budget, workforce shortages, outdated guidelines, and inequitable oral health programs. Power dynamics, particularly with district health officers, further hinder effective governance. The study reveals a siloed approach to oral health with minimal integration into broader health programs. From planning to implementation, weak governance links reflect low political will.

Although recent attention has been given to oral health in Karnataka, substantial reforms are necessary. These include appointing oral health personnel at primary health centres, increasing budgets, revising the Indian Public Health Standards to prioritise oral health in primary care, empowering the oral health directorate, and establishing accountability and surveillance systems. Strengthening governance in these areas is essential to advance oral health equity and contribute to UHC goals in Karnataka.

Oral health is an important part of overall health, but it is often overlooked in India’s public health system. In Karnataka, a southern state of India, the government has made some efforts to improve oral health services, but challenges remain in areas like funding, staffing, and reaching communities with preventive care. This study explored how oral health services are planned, delivered, and managed in Karnataka by speaking with people working in the public health system. We used a governance lens, focusing on how policies are made, implemented, and monitored.

The study found that oral health is not yet treated as a priority in health planning. Services are mostly dentist-centred and focused on treatment, with little attention to prevention. The lack of clear guidelines, data systems, and accountability makes it hard to track progress. The study recommends a shift toward community-based care, more resources, stronger leadership, and better coordination with the private sector to ensure everyone has access to quality oral health services.