Biological evaluation of solutions from bioglass, bioglass modified with cobalt, and calcium hydroxide
João Rafael AMADEU, Isabela Joane Prado SILVA, Juliana GOTO, Alexandre Henrique dos REIS-PRADO, Karina Sampaio CAIAFFA, Murilo Camuri CROVACE, Luciano Tavares Angelo CINTRA, Alberto Carlos Botazzo DELBEM, Cristiane DUQUE, Francine BENETTI

TL;DR
The study compared bioglass and calcium hydroxide solutions for dental use, finding bioglass to be less toxic and more biocompatible, though none showed bioactivity.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the evaluation of cobalt-modified bioglass for vital pulp therapy, showing improved biocompatibility over traditional calcium hydroxide.
Findings
F18 and F18-Co solutions at certain dilutions showed cell viability similar to control, unlike Ca(OH)2.
F18-Co at 1:8 and 1:16 dilutions increased cell viability compared to Ca(OH)2 at 48 hours.
No bioactivity was observed in any material in von Kossa and polarized light analysis.
Abstract
This study evaluated the cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and bioactivity potential of bioglass solutions (F18 and F18 with cobalt; F18-Co) compared to Ca(OH)2 solution, to determine their suitability for use in vital pulp therapy. F18 bioglass was prepared, with a part being doped with cobalt. The solutions were prepared at a 1:10 powder-to-water ratio. L929 fibroblasts viability was assessed (MTT assay; 24 and 48-h). Tubes containing fibrin sponges embedded with either the solutions or saline (control) were prepared (16 tubes/group) and immediately implanted into 16 rats (4 tubes/rat). At 7 and 30 days, the euthanized rat specimens were analyzed for inflammation and bioactivity. The ANOVA with Tukey’s test, or Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s test was performed (p < 0.05). Undiluted, 1:2, and 1:4 diluted solutions reduced cell viability at 24-h (p < 0.05). The 1:8 and 1:16 dilutions of F18…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Hemostasis and retained surgical items
