Comparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects
Ana Maira Pereira BAGGIO, Arthur Henrique Alécio VIOTTO, Izabela Fornazari DELAMURA, Vinicius Ferreira BIZELLI, Ricardo Garcia Mureb JACOB, Ciro Borges Duailibe de DEUS, Rodrigo Faria NEIVA, Leonardo Perez FAVERANI, Ana Paula Farnezi BASSI

TL;DR
This study compared cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for bone regeneration in rats, finding that the cross-linked membrane promoted better bone growth over time.
Contribution
The study provides new in vivo evidence that cross-linked collagen membranes outperform non-cross-linked ones in guided bone regeneration.
Findings
At 60 days, the cross-linked membrane (OSX) showed the highest osteopromotive potential compared to other groups.
MicroCT analysis revealed significantly higher bone volume in the cross-linked membrane group compared to the positive control.
The cross-linked membrane was found to be biologically more favorable for bone regeneration.
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a critical strategy for repairing large bone defects. This study aimed to assess the osteopromotive potential of a porcine cross-linked collagen membrane in critical calvaria-defects in rats. Seventy-two rats were divided into three groups: blood clot (CG - negative control), Bio-Gide® membrane (BG - positive control), and Ossix Plus® membrane (OSX - test). The defects were covered according to each group, and the experimental times were 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The collected samples were evaluated by histometric analysis, inflammatory profile, immunohistochemistry, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). At 7 days, no significant differences in bone neoformation were observed. At 15 days, the OSX group showed increased new bone formation compared to CG (p = 0.031). At 30 days, the BG group exhibited the most significant increase…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
