# Comparative efficacy and safety of topical caspofungin 0.5% and voriconazole 1% for fungal keratitis: a pilot clinical trial

**Authors:** Mehrnaz Atighehchian, Golshan Latifi, Ahmed Shalaby Bardan, Dean Ouano, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Zohreh Abedinifar, Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-22615-w · Scientific Reports · 2025-11-06

## TL;DR

This pilot study compared two eye drops for fungal eye infections and found similar effectiveness between caspofungin and voriconazole.

## Contribution

The study is the first to evaluate topical caspofungin 0.5% as a primary treatment for fungal keratitis in a clinical trial.

## Key findings

- No significant difference in visual acuity improvement between the two treatments after 3 months.
- Voriconazole showed a higher healing rate, but the difference was not statistically significant.
- Caspofungin was as effective as voriconazole against Fusarium species in some cases.

## Abstract

To compare the efficacy of topical caspofungin 0.5% with topical voriconazole 1% in patients with fungal keratitis. In this pilot clinical trial, thirty-four eyes from 34 patients diagnosed with fungal keratitis, confirmed by positive smear or culture results or in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either topical caspofungin 0.5% or voriconazole 1%. The primary outcome measure was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of healed ulcers, time to healing, and scar size. After 3 months of treatment, the mean BSCVA was1.17 ± 0.85 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) units in the caspofungin group and 0.49 ± 0.56 LogMAR units in the voriconazole group and the difference between two groups was 0.18 LogMAR (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.51 P = 0.276). The final mean scar size was similar between the caspofungin group (2.47 ± 2.1) and the voriconazole group (3.09 ± 1.11) (P = 0.254, 95% CI, -1.88 to 0.50 mm). The percentage of cases healed was 70.6% (12/17) in the caspofungin group and 100% (17/17) in the voriconazole group (P = 0.060, Hazard ratio ,2.06 95% CI,0.97 to 4.37). Fusarium species were the most common species (9/34; 26.5% cases). Complete stromal healing occurred in all 5 patients infected with Fusarium species who were treated with voriconazole 1%. one out of 4 patients in the caspofungin group showed complete healing (P = 0.048). The patients in caspofungin group had large mean infiltration size 4.81± 1.60 mm, (P = 0.255) than 2.90± 1.60 mm in voriconazole group and deeper infiltration depth 25 ±13% than 15± 9%voriconazole group (P = 0.120). This study indicates that topical caspofungin 0.5% may be effective as topical voriconazole 1%, making caspofungin 0.5% a viable primary treatment option for patients with fungal keratitis.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-22615-w.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** caspofungin (PubChem CID 16119814), voriconazole (PubChem CID 71616)
- **Diseases:** fungal keratitis (MONDO:0033821)
- **Species:** Fusarium (taxon 5506)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ulcers (MESH:D014456), fungal keratitis (MESH:D009181), infected (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** voriconazole (MESH:D065819), caspofungin (MESH:D000077336)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592481/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592481/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592481