# Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event Outcomes in Patients With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing Medical Weight Management

**Authors:** Nirjhar Dutta, Katelyn M Tessier, Jenna Langer, Tasma Harindhanavudhi, Shalamar D Sibley, Charles Billington, David Vock, Eric S Wise, Eric M Bomberg, Carolyn Bramante

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.94070 · Cureus · 2025-10-07

## TL;DR

This study compared the effectiveness of medical weight management, surgery, and usual care in reducing cardiovascular risks for people with obesity and diabetes.

## Contribution

The study provides new comparative evidence on cardiovascular outcomes of different weight management approaches in patients with obesity and T2D.

## Key findings

- Medical weight management showed no significant difference in MACE risk compared to usual care.
- Metabolic and bariatric surgery showed a trend toward fewer MACE events compared to usual care.
- No significant difference was found between medical weight management and surgery for MACE outcomes.

## Abstract

Objective: We assessed the impact of medical weight management (MWM; lifestyle modification ± obesity medications) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and usual care (UC).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed electronic health records of adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) at an academic health center from 2010 to 2021. The MWM group was propensity score matched on common confounders 1:1 (versus MBS) and 1:5 (versus UC). The primary outcome was a six-component MACE (all-cause mortality, coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and nephropathy).

Results: Among 2,100 patients (300 MWM, 300 MBS, and 1,500 UC), baseline characteristics were similar among groups. During a median 3.2-year follow-up (range 0-11), the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for MACE for MWM versus MBS was 1.61 (0.98-2.65, p=0.06); for MBS versus UC, aHR 0.66 (0.43-1.02, p=0.06); and there was no difference in MWM versus UC, aHR 1.07 (0.77-1.49, p=0.68).

Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in MACE risk were found between those receiving MWM versus UC; there was a trend towards fewer MACE events in those receiving MBS. These findings must be validated in future studies, given that more effective weight loss medications (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) were not available.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** semaglutide (PubChem CID 56843331), tirzepatide (PubChem CID 163285897)
- **Diseases:** Type 2 diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005148), obesity (MONDO:0011122), heart failure (MONDO:0005252), atrial fibrillation (MONDO:0004981)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** nephropathy (MESH:D007674), Obesity (MESH:D009765), atrial fibrillation (MESH:D001281), weight loss (MESH:D015431), Cardiovascular Event (MESH:D002318), T2D (MESH:D003924), heart failure (MESH:D006333)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592220/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592220/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592220/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592220