# Differential electroencephalography responses in speech perception between native and non-native speakers

**Authors:** Luong Do Anh Quan, Le Thi Trang, Inyong Choi, Jihwan Woo

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1661010 · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2025-10-24

## TL;DR

This study shows that non-native speakers rely more on basic sound cues than native speakers when listening to speech in a non-native language.

## Contribution

The study introduces a dual approach using TRFs and PRPs to reveal distinct neural processing strategies in native and non-native speech perception.

## Key findings

- Non-native speakers showed stronger neural tracking of the speech envelope compared to native speakers.
- PRP analyses revealed heightened peaks in non-native speakers for certain phoneme categories.
- No group differences were found in higher-level linguistic features in TRF analyses.

## Abstract

Native and non-native listeners rely on different neural strategies when processing speech in their respective native and non-native languages, encoding distinct features of speech from acoustic to linguistic content in different ways. This study investigated differences in neural responses between native English and Korean speaker when they passively listened to speech in their native and non-native languages using electroencephalography.

The study employed two approaches to examine neural responses: Temporal Response Functions (TRFs) measure how the brain tracks continuous speech features (i.e., speech envelope, phoneme onset, phonemic surprisal, and semantic dissimilarity), and Phoneme-Related Potentials (PRPs) assess phonemic-level processes.

Non-native speakers showed significantly stronger neural tracking of the speech envelope, but no group differences for higher-level linguistic features within analyses of TRFs. PRP analyses, however, revealed distinct response patterns across phoneme categories, with non-native speakers showing heightened peaks.

The results suggest that non-native speakers rely more on bottom-up acoustic cues during passive listening. TRFs and PRPs provide information on neural markers that indicate how speech is processed differently depending on the listener's native language and language experience.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** neurological conditions (MESH:D019636)
- **Chemicals:** PRPs (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592156/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592156/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592156/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12592156