Recent Interventions for Acute Suicidality Delivered in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review
Alex P. Hood, Lauren M. Tibbits, Juan I. Laporta, Jennifer Carrilo, Lacee R. Adams, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Alan L. Peterson, Robert A. DeLorenzo

Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
To the Editor:
We are delighted that the authors of the comment share our enthusiasm for emergency department (ED) expertise in the management of suicidality and appreciate their attention to our scoping review methodology. Their primary concern is the exclusion of standard and generally accepted techniques of screening, joint safety planning, patient education, lethal means counseling, follow-up contacts, and the involvement of friends and family. They rightly point out that the Rosen chapter1 and the guidelines from which it is derived2 should not be taken to define the clinical “standard of care,” which is why we avoided this terminology in our review. However, it is worth noting that the ICAR2E clinical guidelines published by the American College of Emergency Physicians demonstrate almost total overlap with the interventions described in Rosen.3,4
We concur with the authors’ argument that the interventions described in these textbooks merit further study, especially given their current evidentiary basis.3 However, the purpose of our review was to delineate what is on the horizon for the ED management of suicidality and not provide a comprehensive review of interventions that have already been established. Given the lag in publishing, we took the appearance in authoritative textbooks to indicate that the listed interventions are mainstream and, thus, not pertinent to a review of techniques that have been only recently described. Given the concordance of these interventions with current guidelines,3 this method appears to have been effective.
The authors of the comment highlight that critical appraisal of individual sources is optional in the PRISMA-ScR checklist,5 and we acknowledge their perspective on its potential contribution in this topical area. We agree fully with their point that crisis response planning shows promise but that existing evidence for widespread adoption is wanting,6 as we clearly noted in our discussion and conclusion sections.
Suicidality is a significant clinical challenge in the ED, and we thank the comment authors for acknowledging our review.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Betz JM 2018 Suicide Walls R Hockberger R Gausche-Hill M Erickson TB Wilcox SR Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice 9th ed 136673 Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Inc
- 2Capoccia LM Caring for adult patients with suicide risk: a consensus-based guide for emergency departments 2015 Available at: https://sprc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ED Guide_full.pdf Accessed June 8, 2025
- 3Wilson MP Moutier C Wolf LED recommendations for suicide prevention in adults: the ICAR 2E mnemonic and a systematic review of the literature Am J Emerg Med 20203835715813149397810.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.031 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Kivela PD Suicide and the creation of evidence-based guidelines: the ACEP perspective Am J Emerg Med 20193712224622473133760010.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.016 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Tricco AC Lillie E Zarin WPRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-Sc R): checklist and explanation Ann Intern Med 201816974674733017803310.7326/M 18-0850 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Bryan CJ Mintz J Clemans TA Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in U.S. Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial J Affect Disord 201721264722814208510.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
