# Practice beyond performance stabilization increases the use of online adjustments to unpredictable perturbations in an interceptive task

**Authors:** Crislaine Rangel Couto, Cláudio Manoel Ferreira Leite, Carlos Eduardo Campos, Leonardo Luiz Portes, Cíntia de Oliveira Matos, Suziane Peixoto Santos, Natália Fontes Alves Ambrósio, Hani Camille Yehia, Herbert Ugrinowitsch, Job Fransen, Job Fransen, Job Fransen, Dimitris Voudouris, Dimitris Voudouris, Dimitris Voudouris

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313665 · PLOS One · 2025-11-05

## TL;DR

This study shows that practicing a motor task beyond the point of stabilization improves the ability to adjust to unexpected changes during the task.

## Contribution

The study introduces the concept that extended practice beyond stabilization enhances adaptability to unpredictable perturbations in motor tasks.

## Key findings

- Participants who practiced beyond stabilization made more corrections to unexpected target changes.
- Superstabilization practice improved the use of online feedback for motor adjustments.
- Practice until stabilization did not foster adaptive responses to unpredictable events.

## Abstract

In recent decades, research has focused on motor adjustments in interception tasks within predictable environments. However, emerging studies suggest that continued practice beyond performance stabilization enhances the ability to adapt to unpredictable events. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of practicing until performance stabilization versus extended practice through superstabilization on the ability to adjust to unpredictable perturbations in intercepting a moving target. We hypothesized superstabilization would better facilitate motor adjustments in response to unpredictable perturbations. Forty participants engaged in an interception task until they achieved either performance stabilization or superstabilization. Subsequently, both stabilization and superstabilization groups were tested in an unpredictable environment, where, in certain trials, the target’s velocity unexpectedly changed after the onset of the movement. The findings revealed that the superstabilization group made more adjustments, showing more number of corrections (N-cor), in response to these perturbations than the stabilization group, attributed to their developed capacity to use online feedback as a control mechanism more efficiently. In contrast, the practice until performance stabilization did not foster this adaptive mechanism. These results support the notion that learning is a dynamic process that extends beyond the point of performance stabilization, emphasizing the benefits of continued practice for mastering motor tasks in variable contexts.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** orthopedic limitations (MESH:D009140), neurological impairment (MESH:D009422), RODRIGUES (MESH:C535865), Dimitris (MESH:D013341), CE (MESH:D014717)
- **Chemicals:** CE (-), P (MESH:D010758), D (MESH:D003903)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12588517/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12588517/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12588517/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12588517