# Species-specific phylloplane responses to changes in external pH

**Authors:** Cristal López-González, Jean-Baptiste Floc’h, Tanya Renner, Kadeem J Gilbert

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraf157 · Journal of Experimental Botany · 2025-04-14

## TL;DR

Plants adjust their leaf surface pH in response to environmental pH changes, with Gossypium species showing strong buffering abilities.

## Contribution

The study reveals species-specific molecular mechanisms and buffering capacities in plant phylloplane pH regulation.

## Key findings

- Gossypium species strongly buffer phylloplane pH to 6 when exposed to pH 2 within 5 minutes.
- Transcriptional responses to pH changes vary among species, involving Ca2+-signaling and ATPase pumps.
- pH stress impacts photosynthesis and activates abiotic and biotic stress pathways.

## Abstract

The leaf surface, known as the phylloplane, represents the initial point of contact for plants in their interactions with the above-ground environment. Although previous research has assessed how leaves respond to variations in external pH, particularly in the context of acid rain, there remains a limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms through which plants detect, respond to, and mitigate cellular damage. To examine plant responses to changes in external pH, we selected five species known to have a range of phylloplane pH values from alkaline to acidic under normal conditions, and investigated the response of the phylloplane pH to treatments at pH 6.5, 4, and 2. We found that plants were able to modify their phylloplane pH, and that this buffering ability was species-specific; however, only Gossypium species displayed strong buffering. When leaves were exposed to either pH 6.5 or pH 4, the Gossypium species alkalinized the phylloplane pH to slightly higher values than the dry control pH but, remarkably, when leaves were exposed to pH 2, they buffered the pH to 6 within 5 min. Transcriptional analysis further indicated that the responses to external pH changes varied among the five species, with differentially expressed genes associated with Ca2+-signaling pathways as well as Ca2+- and H+-ATPases pumps being highlighted. These findings also suggested that pH stress affected photosynthesis, and that both wetness and moderate pH shifts might trigger additional abiotic and biotic stress-signaling pathways.

Comparative transcriptomics analysis across species with a broad range of leaf-surface pH indicates the molecular mechanisms underlying differing buffering capacities in response to external pH changes.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Ca2+ (PubChem CID 271), H+ (PubChem CID 783)
- **Species:** Gossypium (taxon 3633)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** calcium (MESH:D002118), Ca2+ (-)
- **Species:** Gossypium (genus) [taxon 3633]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12587422/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12587422/full.md

## References

94 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12587422/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12587422