# Palovarotene for patients with multiple hereditary exostosis: results of MO-Ped, a terminated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial

**Authors:** Luca Sangiorgi, Ernest U. Conrad, Fei Shih, Andrew Strahs, David S. Feldman

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-22554-6 · Scientific Reports · 2025-11-04

## TL;DR

A clinical trial testing palovarotene for treating multiple hereditary exostosis in children was terminated early due to safety concerns, showing no significant efficacy.

## Contribution

This study provides insights into palovarotene's safety and lack of efficacy in pediatric MHE patients, despite early termination.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in osteochondroma growth were observed between palovarotene and placebo groups.
- Palovarotene showed an adverse event profile consistent with systemic retinoids but no cases of premature physeal closure.
- The trial was terminated early, limiting interpretation of results due to short treatment duration and small cohort.

## Abstract

A phase II trial (MO-Ped; NCT03442985) assessed palovarotene in pediatric patients with multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE). Patients aged ≤ 14 years with MHE were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, palovarotene 2.5 mg, or palovarotene 5.0 mg daily. Due to concerns of premature physeal closure (PPC), a partial clinical hold was instituted, followed by trial termination. The primary efficacy endpoint was the annualized rate of new osteochondromas (OCs). Safety was assessed. Overall, 193 patients received ≥ 1 dose of palovarotene or placebo. Due to trial termination, no patients completed planned treatment. Prior to 06 December 2019 (patients notified of clinical hold and treatment stopped), 30 patients completed Month 12 efficacy imaging. No significant differences in the annualized rate of new OCs, or change from baseline in volume of OCs or OC cartilage, were observed between treatment groups. The adverse event profile was consistent with systemic retinoids. There was no evidence of an effect of palovarotene on linear growth and no cases of PPC. Overall, palovarotene showed no clear efficacy signal in MHE, resulting in a non-favorable benefit-risk profile. Interpretation of results was limited by the reduced treatment duration and smaller than expected cohort. The trial yielded important data on the natural history of MHE.

Trial registration: NCT03442985 (first posted 22 February 2018)

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-22554-6.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** palovarotene (PubChem CID 10295295)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** MHE (MESH:D005097), OCs (MESH:D015831)
- **Chemicals:** retinoids (MESH:D012176), Palovarotene (MESH:C546535)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12586466/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12586466/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12586466/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12586466