# Flexible, integrated, and person-centered psychiatric care through global treatment budgets: results of the multiperspective study PsychCare

## TL;DR

A new psychiatric care model in Germany improved patient satisfaction and recovery while reducing costs compared to traditional care.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the effectiveness of a flexible, integrated psychiatric care model through a large-scale, multi-method study.

## Key findings

- Patients in the FIT model showed significantly higher treatment satisfaction and recovery compared to traditional care.
- Direct medical costs were significantly lower in the FIT model at both study timepoints.
- Implementation of FIT components correlated with better patient and caregiver outcomes.

## Abstract

To overcome fragmented care provision in Germany, flexible, integrated psychiatric care (FIT) model projects according to § 64b of the German Social Code Book (SGB) V were implemented.

The results of the prospective cross-model, controlled, multiperspective/multimethod study PsychCare are presented and discussed along with data from statutory health insurance (SHI)-based research.

PsychCare applied a multi- and mixed-method design. Primary data were acquired in 18 psychiatric hospitals (n = 10 FIT; n = 8 matched treatment as usual—TAU) at study start (M-I) and 15 months later (M-II). Main outcomes were treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes included recovery, clinical decision-making, symptom severity, healthcare utilization and costs, needs and experiences with care, and caregiver burden. Participatory process evaluation assessed process-, structure-, and experience-related components.

Patients in FIT (n = 595) had significantly higher treatment satisfaction (ZUF-8: 26.3 ± 4.36 vs. 24.9 ± 4.70; p < 0.001) and recovery (RAS‑R total: 134 ± 35.8 vs. 119 ± 54.3; p < 0.001) at M‑I compared to TAU patients (n = 555), despite comparable symptom severity. About 50% of patients reported high satisfaction with clinical decision-making (p > 0.05); FIT caregivers were numerically more satisfied. Direct medical costs were significantly lower in FIT both at M‑I and M‑II. Type of care was associated with the degree of implementation of FIT components. Linking primary and SHI data was feasible.

PsychCare showed that FIT was superior in cross-sectional treatment satisfaction, recovery, and caregiver satisfaction with suggested cost-effectiveness. Long-term FIT success compared to standard care needs further assessment.

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00115-025-01896-6) includes further information and tables.