Solution conformational differences between conventional and CENP-A nucleosomes are accentuated by reversible deformation under high pressure
Kushol Gupta, Nikolina Sekulic, Praveen Kumar Allu, Nicklas Sapp, Qingqiu Huang, Kathryn Sarachan, Mikkel Christensen, Reidar Lund, Susan Krueger, Joseph E Curtis, Richard E Gillilan, Gregory D Van Duyne, Ben E. Black

TL;DR
This study compares how conventional and centromeric nucleosomes behave in solution, revealing that centromeric nucleosomes are more stable under high pressure.
Contribution
The study introduces high-pressure SAXS to reveal structural differences and stability of nucleosomes under pressure.
Findings
Centromeric nucleosomes show less unwrapping and deformation under high pressure compared to conventional nucleosomes.
Both histone identity and DNA sequence affect nucleosome stability in high-pressure conditions.
High-pressure SAXS is a promising method for studying nucleosome and chromatin structure in solution.
Abstract
Solution-based investigation of the physical nature of nucleosomes has its roots in X-ray and neutron scattering experiments, including those that provided the initial observation that DNA wraps around core histones. In this study, we performed a comprehensive small-angle scattering study to compare canonical nucleosomes with variant centromeric nucleosomes harboring the histone variant, CENP-A. We used nucleosome core particles (NCPs) assembled on an artificial positioning sequence (Widom 601) and compared these to those assembled on a natural α- satellite DNA cloned from human centromeres. We establish the native solution properties of octameric H3 and CENP-A NCPs using analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and contrast variation small-angle neutron scattering (CV-SANS). Using high-pressure SAXS (HP-SAXS), we discovered that both histone identity…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory of Computing Technologies · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
