Is it Ever Acceptable to SQUEEZE Charge Balance?
Toby J Woods

TL;DR
The paper discusses when it is acceptable to use charge balance squeezing in crystallography when solvent molecules or counter-ions are too disordered to model accurately.
Contribution
The paper explores the conditions under which squeezing charge balance is justifiable when counter-ions are disordered.
Findings
SQUEEZE routines are typically used for disordered solvent molecules.
The paper questions the use of squeezing when counter-ions are disordered.
Additional characterization may justify squeezing charge balance.
Abstract
When the void spaces of a structure contain highly disordered solvent molecules that cannot be adequately modeled, the SQUEEZE routine of PLATON or Solvent Mask in Olex2 are often used as a last resort to account for the electron density in the void spaces. But, what to do when it is not solvent molecules that are disordered? What if the counter-ions for a charged target molecule are so disordered that they cannot be definitively identified in the difference map? Is there a point at which there is enough additional characterization of a compound that squeezing charge balance could be considered acceptable?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
