Correction: Longitudinal association of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exposure with lipid traits, in a healthy unselected population
Yasrab N. Raza, Julia S. El-Sayed Moustafa, Xinyuan Zhang, Dongmeng Wang, Max Tomlinson, Mario Falchi, Cristina Menni, Ruth C. E. Bowyer, Claire J. Steves, Kerrin S. Small
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Correction to: Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 10.1038/s41370-025-00773-3, published online 24 April 2025
In the sentence beginning ‘We observe higher discordance amongst...’ in this article and in table 2, column ‘Variable’, the term ‘MZ’ should have read ‘DZ’ and vice versa. The corrected table is given below.
The original article has been corrected.
Table 2 Number of twin pairs who were discordant for levels of PFOA or PFOS at each timepoint (n pairs = 971).VariableTimepoint 1Timepoint 2Timepoint 3PFOA N discordant (DZ, MZ)287 (189, 98)320 (207, 113)285 (177, 108)PFOS N discordant (DZ, MZ)283 (183, 100)247 (164, 83)261 (170, 91)