# Evaluating the effectiveness of the “Double Reduction” education policy in China: A study using web scraping, sentiment analysis, and spatial regression

## TL;DR

This study evaluates public satisfaction with China's 'Double Reduction' education policy using social media data and finds regional disparities in its effectiveness.

## Contribution

The study introduces a multi-dimensional, region-specific analysis of public satisfaction with the DR policy using web scraping and spatial regression.

## Key findings

- Chinese residents generally express positive satisfaction with the DR policy, but regional disparities persist.
- Political support has a stronger influence on satisfaction in western provinces, while market support is more impactful in eastern provinces.
- Educational support shows consistent positive effects across all regions without significant interprovincial variation.

## Abstract

The implementation of China’s “Double Reduction” (DR) policy, which aims to alleviate academic and extracurricular burdens, has received considerable attention. However, there has been limited evaluation of public satisfaction with the policy, particularly from a regional and multi-dimensional support perspective. This study aims to assess DR policy satisfaction from Chinese public, through a comprehensive “government–market–school” perspective.

Combining the web scraping technology and sentiment analysis technology, this study captures 2,475,833 Weibo posts from 31 provinces in China related to DR policy. The causal relationship is discussed through spatial regression after controlling for spatial endogeneity.

The findings indicate that Chinese residents generally express positive satisfaction with the DR policy, however, substantial regional disparities persist. Provinces in the western and central regions exhibit lower increases in DR policy satisfaction (DRS) compared to those in the eastern region. All three dimensions—political, market, and educational support—have significant positive effects on DRS. Moreover, the results reveal positive moderations among the three types of support. Political support exerts a stronger influence on DRS in western provinces, whereas market support plays a more prominent role in eastern provinces. No significant interprovincial variation is observed for the effects of educational support.

The study highlights the crucial role of political, market, and educational support in shaping public satisfaction with the DR policy. These findings suggest that targeted interventions are needed to address regional disparities, particularly in underdeveloped areas. Future research should focus on the long-term effects of the DR policy across diverse socio-economic contexts.