Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Level IV Nodal Metastasis in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 578 Node-Positive Patients
Sanjay Chandra Das, Harsh Thakran, Sanuja Paul, Prateek Jain, Guru Charan Sahu, Vikram Dilip Kekatpure, Kapila Manikantan, Angotu Jayakrishnasai, Dhiraj Kumar Mahato, Pattatheyil Arun

TL;DR
This study identifies factors linked to level IV lymph node metastasis in oral cancer patients and assesses their impact on survival rates.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into predictors and clinical outcomes of level IV nodal metastasis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Findings
27.2% of node-positive OCSCC patients had level IV nodal metastasis, with two-year DFS and OS rates of 55% and 72.2%, respectively.
Level IV metastasis was significantly associated with pT4b, pN3b, larger tumor size, and greater depth of invasion.
Primary tongue tumors, larger tumor size, involved margins, and perineural invasion were independent predictors of poorer DFS and OS.
Abstract
Background Nodal metastasis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is associated with poorer prognosis. Limited evidence is available on the predictive factors and prognostic significance of level IV nodal metastasis. This study evaluated patient outcomes by analyzing disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in individuals with level IV nodal involvement. Methods The cohort for this retrospective study comprised all patients with node-positive OCSCC who underwent surgery between August 2011 and June 2021. The patients’ demographic and treatment details were abstracted from the electronic medical records. DFS and OS were analyzed using a log-rank test for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis. Results Among the cohort of 578 node-positive patients, 27.2% exhibited level IV nodal metastasis. The two-year DFS and OS…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHead and Neck Cancer Studies · Head and Neck Surgical Oncology · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
