Mobilising Knowledge for General Practice Decarbonisation: Maximising Impact Through a Multi‐Stakeholder Workshop
Ana Raquel Nunes, Olivia Geddes, Florence Karaba, Abi Eccles, Helen Twohig, Helen Atherton, Frederik Dahlmann, Michael Gregg, Rachel Spencer, Jeremy Dale

TL;DR
This paper discusses how a multi-stakeholder workshop helped identify ways to reduce carbon emissions in general practice by engaging various groups and refining research outputs.
Contribution
The novel contribution is demonstrating how stakeholder engagement through a KMb workshop can refine and maximize the impact of decarbonization strategies in general practice.
Findings
Four key themes emerged: bridging knowledge/resource gaps, organizational/cultural barriers, public engagement, and policy/leadership as drivers of change.
Stakeholder input was effectively integrated into refining research outputs like the Policy Brief and Factsheet.
Involving lay representatives and public input ensured more impactful dissemination strategies.
Abstract
This manuscript explores how knowledge mobilisation (KMb), through a multi‐stakeholder workshop, can advance decarbonisation in general practice by interpreting findings from the GPNET‐0 study, which includes a systematic review, a GP survey and longitudinal case studies. The KMb workshop serves as a platform to interpret and disseminate its findings, thereby informing the development and refinement of outputs (i.e., Policy Brief and Factsheet) and the tailoring of audience‐specific dissemination strategies. Fifteen stakeholders were selected from key groups across the United Kingdom, including public representatives, policymakers and general practitioners. The workshop was structured with presentations, group discussions and interactive activities to encourage targeted dialogue. Pre‐workshop materials, including a Policy Brief and Factsheet, were shared with participants to promote…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health and Patient Involvement · Health Policy Implementation Science · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
