# Vocalization behaviors in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and rough-toothed dolphins (Steno bredanensis)

## TL;DR

This study compares vocalization behaviors of two dolphin species in captivity during training and feeding, revealing distinct patterns that could help assess their welfare.

## Contribution

The study provides baseline acoustic data for rough-toothed dolphins and reveals species-specific vocal responses to human activities in captivity.

## Key findings

- Rough-toothed dolphins produced more clicks and fewer whistles than bottlenose dolphins.
- Bottlenose dolphins increased whistles during training, while rough-toothed dolphins reduced them.
- Both species changed whistle types during feeding, but neither showed significant vocal changes during feeding overall.

## Abstract

Odontocetes rely on vocalizations for navigation, foraging, and communication. Their vocalization patterns are associated with environmental conditions and behavioral contexts, particularly in captive populations. This study investigated the vocalization behaviors of captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and rough-toothed dolphins (Steno bredanensis) using continuous acoustic monitoring. The focus was on their responses to human-involved training and feeding activities. Comparative analyses revealed that rough-toothed dolphins produced significantly more clicks and fewer whistles than bottlenose dolphins (p < 0.05). During training, bottlenose dolphins reduced their click rate by 41% but increased whistle production by 125%. In contrast, rough-toothed dolphins showed no significant change in click emissions (from 643.9/min to 597.4/min, p > 0.05), but significantly reduced whistles by 56% (p < 0.05). Neither species exhibited significant changes in vocalization during feeding. However, rough-toothed dolphins shifted their predominant whistle type from “constant” to “sinusoidal”, while bottlenose dolphins changed from “constant” to “upsweep” during feeding. These findings offer valuable insights expanding current knowledge of dolphin vocal patterns under captivity and establish baseline information potentially supporting acoustic assessment of captive dolphin welfare, particularly for the understudied rough-toothed dolphin.